Hot Ocean Sunset

Hawaii’s Ocean is Hot, and Getting Hotter

All in all, 2023 was Earth’s hottest year in over 150 years. Surrounded by Ocean, Hawaii’s climate clock is running down to zero hour faster than many realize.  As it was with ancient Hawaiians, Hawaii today is fully dependent upon and linked to the ocean which surrounds it.

Ocean Heatting Graph 2For the past year, oceans around the world have been substantially warmer than usual. January 2024 was the hottest month on record in the world’s oceans, and temperatures have continued to rise since then.

The New York Times described the new climate findings earlier this week in very stark terms with a headline that read;  “Scientists Are Freaking Out About Ocean Temperatures”.

For the past year, oceans around the world have been substantially warmer than usual. Last month was the hottest January on record in the world’s oceans, and temperatures have continued to rise since then. Each new year now is producing new global heating records.

New data from a variety of sources has led climate scientists to suggest that global warming is accelerating

University of Miami, Brian McNoldy, an expert in hurricane formation, has been tracking the latest temperature data from the North Atlantic with a mixture of concern and bewilderment. McNoldy sums things up this way …“The North Atlantic has been record-breaking warm for a year now,”, “it’s just astonishing. It’s quite scary, partly because I’m not hearing any scientists that have a convincing explanation of why it is we’ve got such a departure. We’re used to having a fairly good handle on things. But the impression at the moment is that global heating has gone further and faster than we expected.”

Over the past year, worldwide average temperatures were more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, higher than before the industrial age, and sea temperatures have kept on climbing in February, surpassing the daily records set last August.

The principal driver of all this warmth is no mystery to scientists: The burning of fossil fuels, global deforestation, and other human activities are driving temperatures steadily upward. The current El Niño weather cycle is also allowing more ocean heat to be released into the atmosphere.Ocean Heat Hurricane Supercharging

More than 680 million people, nearly 10 percent of the global population, live in low-lying coastal zones. Bearing the brunt of climate-driven ocean extremes, some highly vulnerable communities in low-lying areas, including small Pacific island chains, are 15 times more likely to be killed by floods and storms, compared to other regions with lower climate vulnerability.

A well-established link between rising ocean temperatures and an increasing imbalance between healthy marine environments is also well understood.

The ocean further generates 50 percent of the oxygen we need, absorbs 25 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions, and captures 90 percent of the excess heat generated by these emissions. It is not just ‘the lungs of the planet’ but also its largest ‘carbon sink’ – a vital buffer against the impacts of climate change.

The ocean is also central to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and stabilizing the Earth’s climate.  However, increasing greenhouse gas emissions have affected the health of the ocean  – warming and acidifying seawater – causing detrimental changes to life underwater and on land, and reducing the ocean’s ability to absorb carbon dioxide and safeguard life on the planet.

Warmer oceans provide more fuel for hurricanes and atmospheric river storms and can disrupt marine life, and life on land. Hawaii’s policymakers and residents who ignore what’s happening around them and delay or procrastinate meaningful transition measures which prepare Hawaii for the new climate reality now underway, do so at their and everyone else’s peril.


The Climate Outlook for Hawaii and the Mid-Pacific

New data from a variety of sources has led some climate scientists to suggest that global warming is acceleratingIt was the hottest January on record for the oceans, too, according to the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service.

Ocean Heating Sat View

The intensity of recent underwater heat waves prompted the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in December to add three new levels to its system of ocean heat alerts to indicate where corals might be bleaching or dying.

It is already well established that Hawaii’s globally remote mid-Pacific location does not exempt the state from macro changes in climate, rising temperatures, and extreme weather events no underway. Changes in climate are further impacting Hawaii’s historic seasonal weather and temperature patterns, producing increasing extreme weather events, as the painful consequences of the recent Lahaina extreme wind storm and fire tragedy demonstrated to all of Hawaii’s residents.

For island states like Hawaii, sea level rise is inescapable.  The global impacts of warming are compounded by El Niño events in the equatorial Pacific, increasingly fueling elevated sea surface temperatures and the corresponding consequences.

Ocean temperatures in the mid-Pacific have been rising steadily and significantly over the past 50 years, consistently rising, with an average rise of 0.14°F per decade from 1901 through 2020.  Recent data shows that overall ocean temperatures have surpassed 70° Fahrenheit, reaching uncharted territory for modern records.

The rapid acceleration of ocean temperatures has now led scientists to express serious concerns about the uncharted territory we are entering due to unprecedented levels of warming in oceans and air temperatures.

For Hawaii, rising ocean temperatures are already having profound impacts on:

  • Marine ecosystems
  • accelerated coral bleaching,
  • changes in biodiversity, and
  • disruptions to weather patterns, locally and globally, and 
  • agricultural impacts.

An El Niño pattern like the one currently observed in the Pacific is associated with warmer years for the planet, as well as a swath of effects on rainfall and temperatures in specific regions.

Island Sea Shoreside Water RiseBut as humans heat the planet, the effects that forecasters could once confidently expect El Niño to have on local temperatures are no longer predictable, said Michelle L’Heureux, a NOAA scientist who studies El Niño and its opposite phase, La Niña.

As rising temperatures drive rising sea levels, Hawaii and other island states find themselves on the front lines of changes now demanding a sea-change of climate adaptation measures in the form of local mitigation measures; environmental, structural, and social.

The Effects of Sea Level Rise in Hawaii

Sea level rise in Hawaii is primarily attributed to global warming and the resulting melting of ice caps, leading to the expansion of seawater and the inundation of coastal areas. The rise in sea level around Hawaii is accelerated by factors such as melting ice caps, increasing air and sea surface temperatures, an overall decline in rainfall, and decreased stream base flows.

The impacts of rising sea levels in Hawaii are already being felt and are projected to worsen significantly in the coming years, Hawaii can expect:

  • Coastal Flooding: Increased frequency and reach of coastal floods affecting communities.
  • Coastal Erosion: Loss of beaches with 13 miles already eroded, threatening 70% of beaches statewide.
  • Inland Flooding: More frequent flooding further inland, affecting communities not just near the coast.
  • High Tide Flooding: More frequent high tide flooding threatening cities, damaging infrastructure, roads, and overwhelming drainage systems.
  • Cultural Impact: Affecting traditional practices like fishpond maintenance, salt cultivation, and nearshore fisheries gathering.

Sea Level Rise HonoluluA 2050 forecast of rising sea levels, increasing droughts, and hot ocean temperatures in the waters surrounding Hawaii all point to a state presently unprepared for the growing threat to the state’s sustainability, economic viability, and livability.

In the last decade, the speed at which Hawaii’s sea level is rising has increased — rising by as much as 1 inch every 3 years. Around Hilo Bay, it took 17 years for the sea level to rise 6 inches. Scientists now forecast the same increase in sea level rise will occur in less than the next 12 years.

By the end of the century, Honolulu could experience a sea level rise between 1.3 feet and 5.8 feet, and depending rising and accumulated carbon emissions.  Events may be moving faster than science as forward looking sea-level estimates are increasingly being challenged as “too conservative”.  Only recently has science begun to fully understand and factor new data elements such as recently quantifiable and accelerating meltdown of antarctic glaciers and ice caps.  It is increasingly likely that Hawaii overall will see 3 feet or more of sea level rise by the end of this century, with higher levels plausible.

Building resilience into Hawaii’s economic, social, and environmental ecosystems requires more than just focusing on the state’s coastal communities.  Hawaii is dependent upon a healthy and predictable ocean. That would include adaptation measures that predict risks, vulnerabilities, and solutions – including early warning systems and sustainable nature-based solutions to help communities cope with changing coastlines and failing ecosystems now under climate stress.


Publisher’s note to our readers

Continuing to live in the past is a social, economic, and cultural failure of state policy towards a meaningful climate threat response. This failure can be measured in varying degrees, but the indisputable conclusion is we are failing ourselves, our families, and placing added risks on the current and future generations of Hawaii’s residents – it is our carpe diem climate moment. 

Solar Person Graphic

Hawaii’s Clean Energy Options; Today

Chapter One – what happened …

Recently, residents and businesses of Oahu and Hawaii Island were advised of an all too familiar public message “…customers are asked to reduce electricity use.

Just last week local news outlets led with this story and requested of Hawaii Island residents…“Hawaiian Electric is asking residential and business customers on Hawai‘i Island to reduce their electricity use tonight, especially from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. when electricity use is highest. The conservation of power will help ensure that there is enough power available for all customers.”

Power OutageThe Utility’s request for energy conservation was prompted by the failure of more than one of its large (so-called firm energy) combustion power plants. Two other combustion power plants were also shut for maintenance demonstrating the fragile of house of cards of the state’s energy grid. It was also what became the perfect storm in a chain of gird operating events concluding in a power supply emergency, and forcing the utility into a series of rolling customer power blackouts in an effort to prevent a system-wide power failure.

Hawaii Island’s 17,000 rooftop solar residents and businesses, and utility customers with whole house battery back-up were unaffected and remained power self-sufficient during the declared power emergency. These same utility customers were also fully protected from the utility’s planned rolling power outages, which also come with notorious property-damaging power surges impacting appliances, computers, and other plugged-in high-value electronics.

HELCO’s power problems began when independent power producer Hamakua Energy (a hybrid fueled combustion power plant consisting of 90% tar sands oil and 10% bio-fuel mix) unexpectedly tripped offline late in the afternoon.

Powerwall Gateway Report Outage SmallHELCO’s remaining combustion power plants on which the utility relies, were either shut for repeated maintenance and repair cycles.  In the case of the state’s only geothermal power plant, Puna Geothermal Venture on Hawaii Island, the plant has been operating at reduced power production capacity, and well below its power production commitment to HELCO, and in its reduced operating state unable to close the power gap.  This has been a recurring theme for PGV operations since the 2018 eruption of Kilauea which fully disrupted geothermal operations for more than 2 years. It further demonstrates in this most recent power failure event PGV’s inability to perform as contracted, and supports what local critics of the plant have been saying all along … it is a community environmental hazard, expensive to operate, and unreliable in its capacity as a so-called firm power plant.

In addition to Hamakua service disruption and PGV’s power capacity issues, Hawaiian Electric’s Hill Plant Unit No. 5, Keahole CT-5, and separately, Puna Steam Plant were shut down and unavailable for scheduled maintenance and repairs (high maintenance for combustion power plants with their many system components and moving parts is indicative of the technology required to maintain 24×7 firm power combustion plant operations).

The only grid-scale solar power plant plus storage on Hawaii Island, the AES Waikoloa Solar + Storage Plant which began commercial operations in April 2023, mitigated the impacts of utility’s overall system operating failures and production shortfalls. The Solar plant is the largest project of its kind on Hawaii Island, with a 30 MW solar photovoltaic system and a 120 MWh containerized lithium-ion battery energy storage system. Just this one Solar plant addition to the grid is expected to lower residential monthly utility bills by about $5.

The project is located on 300 acres along Waikoloa Road and is supported by a 25-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Hawaiian Electric, providing power to nearly 14,000 homes. The plant is designed to reduce visual impacts, has undergone cultural and archaeological assessments, and includes safety measures such as fire suppression systems and non-vegetated firebreaks. The project has been well received by the community and is a shining example of how Hawaii can achieve it’s 100% (clean) renewable energy goal before 2045.

Aes Waikoloa SolarAltogether, the solar plant propped-up the utility’s combustion plant-generated power shortfalls and a system wide service outage.  Solar energy+storage  at utility scale, coupled to customer sited distributed rooftop solar assets prevented a bad power situation from getting much worse.  Extra credit was due island residents who curtailed their power consumption during the grid operating shortfall.  Hawaiian Electric and ratepayers were lucky in contrast to what could have easily been a much worse and extended loss of service across the entire Island, and a greater service outage impact on residents and the economy.



Chapter Two – it all adds up

Fuel / Maintenance Costs, Operating Reliability, and Sustainability 

The U.S. Energy Information Administration which provides data on the operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for different types of power generation found that large-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) installations with/without battery storage are among the cheapest and most reliable power generation technologies to operate. According to the energy agency, a comparison of costs between solar power and combustion fossil and biofuels plants favors solar power installations, which have repeatedly demonstrated lower operating costs and minimal operating and maintenance (O&M) requirements, altogether supporting greater cost efficiency outcomes to the benefit of utility profits and ratepayer energy costs…

Beyond, periodic cleaning and inspection, solar energy power plants are truly the O&M low-cost energy winner.  In contrast, combustion power plants burn various fuels to create heat towards converting water into steam, which in turn spins large turbines to generate electricity — altogether is an electricity generation process that inherently results in higher operating costs and added fuel costs measured in combustion plant maintenance and operating costs.  Solar, and even Wind Power turbines, are simply cheaper to operate and offer greater power generation reliability when executed properly over the lifetime of their investment – a missing element of ratepayer consideration in Hawaiian Electric’s weak adoption record to date of solar and wind assets and clean power into their grid energy mix.

Hamakua Energy PlantIn a comparison of costs between solar and wind power vs. combustion power plants, solar and wind power installations can further credit their overall lower lifetime operating costs to their base fuels; sunlight and wind. These two natural energy zero-cost and zero-emissions fuel sources, although variable, do not have supply chain issues. In contrast, fossil fuel and biofuel power plants which not only have higher maintenance costs, are subject to the variables of continuous purchases of fuel-to-burn from suppliers, which are further subject to market supply variables and price fluctuations that contribute to higher energy costs borne by ratepayers, not utilities.

Added fuel costs and supply risks are associated with HE’s dirty energy combustion power plants, favored by the utility.   From a utility’s perspective, maintenance cost comparisons between combustion power plants and solar power plants are secondary financial considerations when costs and risks are fully assumed by ratepayers. Yet, both are important considerations in the choice of appropriate energy supply options available today.

Utilities often fail to fully factor all aspects of the energy source choices they make. Front and center is the plant’s return-on-investment (ROI) when utility the plant is utility owned and operated. Operating reliability considerations are generally relegated to a grid operators’ preference, in the case Hawaiian Electric, with issues as to the plant’s technology and operator (when third-party owned and operated), as secondary considers that rarely serve the public interest.   Altogether, important grid energy supply decisions represent the vested interests of the utility’s customer base ( ratepayers), but are rarely challenge assumptions by the public who generally trust the utility operate in their best interest.  Yet, within this one-sided relationship between utility and ratepayer, lessons repeatedly learned, are quickly and forgotten.  A call for significant changes in the present process of governing energy choices made by the regulated utility fail public scrutiny, gnerally after the fact, as recent events service outages on both Hawaii Island and Oahu have demonstrated.


Fully automated Solar plus Power Plant (Kauai)

Clean energy with power battery power provisioning at scale; no moving parts, low cost, high reliability of operation

Mililani Solar Power Plant


Combustion Power Plant example (Hawaii Island)

Maintenance-intensive, fuel burning reliant, less reliable, costly to operate, and polluting 

Hawaiian Electric Aging And Polluting Combustion Power Plants Hill Plant Unit No. 5 Google Search

 



Chapter Three – a power play

How the Power Playing Field is Changing

Hawaii’s utility lexicon is ripe with insider terms system like “baseload” and “firm power”. The latter is frequently used the Utility’s political agents as a weapon against solar and other under-deployed clean power options within the state (except in Kauai) to justify the status quo energy path we’re on and explain Hawaiian Electric’s (HE) power plant choices 9 times out of ten favoring combustion power plants. It is a future energy outlook in which state could burn its way off fossil fuels an onto other dirty fuel options associated with the state’s HE-dependent combustion power plants, both utility-owned and outsourced.

Most of Hawaii’s residents and state economy depend on HE’s combustion power choices and are expected to assume their electricity options are dictated by their utility and operate in their best interest. It is worth remembering that publicly-traded utilities, as is the case with HE are first and foremost responsible to their shareholders, and ratepayers (customers) are merely funding their operating profits.

However, ratepayers, which includes most state politicians, along with the state PUC do have options in directing the utility’s energy choices. Today’s combustion power plants are neither sustainable nor cost and energy-effective power options, they are merely easier low-risk, and utility-invested power options that come at a high cost to ratepayers who foot the bill, and to Hawaii’s residents who pay the price in pollution and unsustainable energy combustion outcomes at a time when our planet is undergoing a growing climate crisis.

Hawaiian Electric’s Baseload Utility Grid Power Model: Outdated, Costly, Less Reliable, and …Unsustainable

The 20th-century “Baseload” utility power model is increasingly costly, inefficient, and certainly out-of-step with 21st-century power demands and clean power technology replacements. Coupled with advances within the areas of energy storage, rooftop solar and utility-scale solar and wind resources coupled with battery storage technology are increasingly supporting grid scale 24×7 customer energy demands, with or without expensive last-century combustion power plants.

In the case of the state’s largest utility, Hawaiian Electric, it has been and remains stuck on a power provisioning strategy dominated by last-century utility operating assumptions, and primarily supported by combustion power plants burning various fuels around the clock to maintain a stable state of power output to the grid, aka baseload power.  It is also possible the most expensive power generation and operating practice within the state – one that is indifferent to customer self-generation energy opportunities and an overall market transition to a more distributed and resilient grid power provisioning architecture, one that further and further away from centralized 20th century grid power model, long-hauling power over great distances between the point of power generation, and the end point of consumption. It is a utility operating model that is increasing expensive to maintain, and increasingly unstable to operate in light of accelerating climate consequences worldwide.

Combined Base Distributed 24 Hr Power Generation Commparison

Today’s electricity grid system is highly reliant on so-called “baseload” power plants.  The combustion energy resources they represent are increasingly out of step with today’s lower cost, clean renewable energy technology options, and distributed energy options which enable power to be generated at or near the power of consumption instead of long-hauling power of a fragile and expensive grid system. In terms of operating reliability, Hawaiian Electric’s baseload energy supply models and partners are increasingly demonstrating more, not less, cost increases and unreliability in a changing world — and who pays the bills; utility ratepayers.

The price competition from zero emissions clean and 100% renewable energy combined with 21st-century energy storage options and natural gas is far stronger than it was in the past, meaning that it no longer makes sense to default to inflexible baseload power plants, which are enabled adjust and load-balance instantly ramp up and down, to serve variations in power demand. Instead, as many already are doing, regulatory and other decision-makers should focus on a framework that:

(a) effectively and efficiently defines a electricity system linked public needs and in compliance with clean energy policies designed to advance operational flexibility, resilience, greenhouse gas abatement, and last but certainly not least, lowering energy costs for consumers ), and secondly,

(b) develop tools, markets, and methodologies that draw upon an increasing range of available distributed zero emissions energy generation and storage options applied towards Hawaii’s unique service geography, as in self-reliant and stand-alone community microgrids linked together to rooftop solar systems and other localized clean energy power systems — it is complete transition to distributed statewide power system no longer dependent on a last century grid energy assumption and obsolete power generation and energy management assumptions presently governing the state’s largest utility.



Chapter Four – full of better options

Clean Power Community Microgrids; Resilient and Self-Sufficient

Community MicrogridGranted, there may never come a day when every qualified building rooftop in Hawaii will have solar installed and on-site batteries providing energy management security and efficiencies without the need for a centralized power monopoly.  However, Hawaii’s abundant natural and non-polluting solar and wind energy sources (when appropriately applied) are by far proven to be the most cost and energy efficient options available today.

Clean energy technology options which are available today with unprecedented consumer power visibility, flexibility, and management options. At the utility demand scale, battery storage offers on-demand power provisioning from wind sources (when the wind is not blowing) and solar energy at night with the ability to ramp up or down quickly to meet changing demands – eliminating the so-called need for grid-based and wasteful Baseload power production.

Community Microgrids further enable power resiliency by generating power at and near where power is consumed, rather wastefully long hauling to the point of consumption some distance away from where it is generated.  Microgrids manage and distribute power locally, offering greater power efficiency, providing power flexibility not otherwise possible, improve cost performance and power resiliency for all concerned.

Additionally, markets (including Hawaii) can and will eventually embrace the value of state-mandated energy policy options which advance today’s wind and solar power deployment options coupled to battery storage (scaled to firm power standards) — something HE has yet to demonstrate throughout its service territory, and certainly so not at scale to meet the state’s growing power transition requirements  off fossil fuels and to greater power self-sufficiency throughout the state. Between policy, will, and profit motivates out of synch with the greater good, Hawaii Electric  continues to stand in stark contrast Kauai Island’s clean energy leadership and business model.



editor P.S.

The Civil Beat reported earlier today (2-20-24) of a legislature-driven statewide taxpayer & ratepayer funded bailout of Hawaii Electric Co, ow in the works. CB reported that Lawmakers are calling for significant changes at Hawaiian Electric Co. in exchange for letting the utility charge a new fee to customers to raise money to deal with wildfire costs. The fundamental change sought by HECO would allow the company to impose new fees on its 460,000 customers statewide outside the standard ratemaking process. The utility could use the fees to finance bonds at a lower interest rate than it could otherwise obtain. 

HECO faces substantial liabilities related to the Maui wildfires, which destroyed much of Lahaina and killed at least 101 people last August. As a result, shares of parent company Hawaiian Electric Industries have plummeted, and credit rating agencies have downgraded the company’s to a junk bond rating, which in turn costs the utility more to borrow as it seeks to deal with rising wildfire costs and its fire-related operating liabilities. 

Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, the legislative driver of a utility bailout said in an interview today. “Put simply, what’s being proposed is a fundamental change to the dynamic between the state and the utility. And so the question is…, What type of fundamental change should be made in return?”   

Our advice Sen Keoohaloke, read this article!

Climate Change Before & After

2024, Hawaii looks forward with one eye on the rearview mirror

Editorial >

With Hawaii Gov. Josh Green Governor citing the growing impacts of global warming, the states’ top official acknowledged what most residents already know — that is, we are in the early stages of a growing and unstoppable climate crisis, and one which is now modifying Hawaii’s weather and the state’s climate outlook for the foreseeable future.

On Monday, Governor Green announced statewide efforts to enact a climate impact fee on tourists, somebody has to pay.  The $25 climate fee would be levied on visitors who stay hotels or short-term rentals. Green called it a “modest” fee that was “far less than the resort fees or other taxes visitors have paid for years.” He estimated it would generate more than $68 million every year for the state’s use.

Legislative firewall

Last year, a similar proposal died in the Senate in what is increasingly proving to be a dysfunctional legislative process controlled by just two powerful Senators controlling key committee positions, and who are operating without public accountability. Their self-appointed roles as special-interest gatekeepers determine which bills reach a legislative floor vote, let alone ever reaching the Governor’s desk for enactment. It is an example of state democracy at its worse, and one which too many of our citizens haplessly accept as Hawaii’s business-as-usual formula for determining statewide governing priorities. But it is also an obsolete legislative practice, and one which is now threatening a bold climate-response essential to the future of the state, and which will inevitably challenge the status quo.

Globa Heating Graph 2023 A warning heard loud & clear

The 2023 Maui wildfires that killed at least 100 people, caused widespread destruction, leaving several thousand Lahaina residents without homes, and is the front and center priority for this 2024 legislative cycle. Other pressing state business will more than likely be deferred to future legislative sessions.

One leadership bright spot which kicked-off the new year was a public presentation by some of Hawaii’s best and brightest on the state of climate – weather changes increasingly impacting Hawaii, and the world. The January 11th event, aka the 32nd legislative Interim of 2023, was hosted by Senator Mike Gabbard and Rep. Nicole Lowen, each responsible for environmental and climate issues within their respective state legislative chambers.

With each passing year, it is globally hotter than the previous year.

One of the presentations high points during the 3-hour hearing was Hawaii’s foremost climate expert, Chip Fletcher, PhD – University of Hawaii at Manoa. Dr. Fletcher provided the panel with a detailed overview of present and future climate consequences on life in Hawaii as the result of rising global temperatures now underway.

Three (3) climate-impacted areas of particular interest to the audience and the state are 1) increasing drought impacts on agriculture, 2) flooding of low-lying coastal areas, and 3) the increasing frequency and ferocity of cyclones and extreme weather events, the latter has been directly linked to the Lahaina fire disaster on Maui last year.

Sustianability Policy Elements1A corresponding climate-sustainability message all presenters seem to agree on was the need for an urgent and statewide transition (one superseding old assumptions), and that time is not on our side when it comes to preparing for the inevitability climate changes. And, how Hawaii is ill-equipped to address a rapidly changing climate increasingly measured in lost opportunity, and rising economic and social costs.

 

 

 

 

 

Ev V Gas1

Hawaii’s EV Transition; ICE versus EVs – Part Two

Why going all-electric in Hawaii makes sense for many of the state’s residents

Hawaii State Map 1There are many wonderful and unique things about living in Hawaii, but personal transportation and vehicle ownership does not generally come to mind as one of them.

Island living means just that, no matter how far you travel you will eventually find yourself back where you started due to geographic constraints. These constraints are most favorable to vehicle ownership in terms of limited miles traveled in the life of a vehicle’s ownership. This is even more true for those residents of the state driving all-electric today or those considering doing the same in the near future.

Early EV adopters in Hawaii mostly rely on home charging options, a trend represented by most EV owners today, nationally.  Hawaii and its resident islands, however, offer EV owners less concerns about so-called range anxiety with most EV models today offering a driving range of 200-300 miles between charges, with the average Hawaii driver traveling 40-50 miles per day.  It is also an established fact and government goal to advance a low cost and reliable public charging network across North America and in Hawaii and Alaska in funded infrastructure development now underway.

Home charging represents, possibly, the least EV ownership charging option, and certainly the most convenient and efficient means of EV charging (fueling) for electric vehicle owners. Low cost L2 home chargers are defined as medium speed charging, offering between 30-50 miles per hour added vehicle battery range for each hour of charging, and requiring little more than electrical dryer outlet in a garage or carport to plug into and achieve a full overnight vehicle charge.

For EV owners, the ease, convenience and reliability of home charging is a time investment well worth making, and easy as plugging-in one’s phone for an overnight charge.

Although EV ownership with home charging in Hawaii (today) is not for everyone, it does offers the ultimate benefits to Hawaii residents of convenience, and significant cost savings when home charging is coupled to rooftop solar (best with home power storage). The marriage of SUN, Solar, and EV ownership, which altogether represent the most efficient and climate-friendly example of vehicle charging directly from the Sun, while by-passing the high utility service costs, and dirty power sources employed by the state’s largest utility.

But for the broader marketplace many future EV drivers, perhaps especially true for Hawaii, will wait for a more mature public infrastructure and charging network with outlets and stations that continue to evolve into national fueling network system equal to and eventually superior to that of world’s century-old network of national and international gas station stops. And while they wait they will pay more their personal transportation and the price uncertainties associated with volatile and uncertain global fossil fuel markets.


EV Ownership in Hawaii; Questions and Answers

Every vehicle on the road today has what is referred to as a “powertrain”, the system which powers the vehicle from point A-to-B.

It is a fact that all-electric vehicles have only about 15% of the components of a traditional ICE gas or diesel fueled vehicle.  Less parts = less ownership cost, and greater reliability and energy-to-performance vehicle capabilities.

Most ICE propulsion system components have been replace and single drive battery which controls electric motor(s) on the front or back or both sets of wheels. Going all-electric also offers benefits of design simplicity, with fewer components to maintain, fail and replace within the vehicle’s life. It is that which differentiates EVs from ICE vehicles in terms of lifetime ownership costs, efficiency, and performance.

The following ownership cost / time factors comparison reveal the stark differences between ICE and EV ownership factors for Hawaii’s drivers

ICE VEHICLE OWNERSHIP — ESTIMATED FUELING TIME & COST EXPENDED ANNUALLY:
  • AVERAGE TIME ICE OWNERS SPEND ENGAGED ANNUALLY REFUELING A GAS / DIESEL POWERED VEHICLE
    • 9 1/4 hours of lost time per year dedicated to re-refueling 
  • AVERAGE COST ICE OWNERS SPEND ANNUALLY REFUELING A GAS / DIESEL POWERED VEHICLE
    • $2,650 annual re-refueling cost 
EV (HOME CHARGING; UTILITY SOURCED ELECTRICITY) — ESTIMATED CHARGING TIME & COST EXPENDED ANNUALLY:
  • AVERAGE TIME EV OWNERS SPEND ENGAGED ANNUALLY CHARGING AT HOME
    • 3 1/3 hours of time per year dedicated to home charging set-up /disengagement 
  • AVERAGE COST EV OWNER ENERGY COST FOR ANNUAL CHARGING
    • $    0 annual recharging cost (home charging with rooftop solar)  
    • $250 annual recharging cost (home charging with utility)

 

Ev Vs Gas Enegy Efficiency1The Idaho National Laboratory and other studies have determined today’s electric vehicles have an energy efficiency range of 3-to-4 miles range per each kWh consumed which translates into about 3.3 cents per mile travelled when electricity costs 10 cents per kWh. For Hawaii, HE utility  Electric rates range from a low of 36 cents to 53 cents per KWh. The statewide average for all HE rate groups nears $0.50 per KWh, and when applied to the annual cost for home EV charging from utility-supplied power is still a bargain compared to gas-diesel powered vehicle fuel costs.

Vehicle Maintenance

Dealership visits, vehicle maintenance, and other ownership-invested costs represent stark frequency and cost differences between (ICE) gas-powered vehicle vs. an electric vehicle (EV) ownership experiences.

The question of after-sale dealership support has many facets, but one common area all vehicle owners face are generally some level of maintenance responsibilities and out-of-pocket costs. For (EV) electric vehicle owners a very small percentage of the parts are shared with an ICE vehicle, tires being the primary example. EVs require little maintenance or parts replacement in comparison to the added time and money invested by their ICE owner counterparts.

Referring to ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicles as obsolete may sound harsh to some, but that is today’s personal transportation reality.


Notation:

Large SUVs and pickups consume considerably more fuel than do subcompact cars; and owner driving habits vary widely. BeyondKona has researched local and national sources in developing the aforementioned time and cost vehicle ownership averages; and data which is provided for readers reference and guidance purposes only, and which are cited within this article series include the following research assumptions:

  • ICE milage average of 23 MPG is assumed as a combined fuel economy for all Hawaii’s personal vehicle classes (non-commercial):  
    • Average 28 MPG combined fuel economy – Sedans (50% market share assumption)
    • Average 18 MPG combined fuel economy – SUV / Light Trucks (50% market share assumption)
    • Most vehicles’ average fuel tank capacity is between 10.5 and 18.5 gallons or a combined all personal vehicle classes fuel tank size of 14.5 gallons
    • Most EV’s today average battery size is 72 KWh and with active charging range of 50KWh or more. (miles driven per KWh are subject to different EV models, drivers, and driving conditions, some factors governing MPG with ICE vehicles)

The national average cost for electricity in the U.S. is about 10 cents per kWh, while the average residential rate is about 11.7 cents per kWh, while Hawaii’s largest utility, Hawaii’s consumer electricity rates are 4 to 5 times than the national average, and as such, have been factored into the article’s localized vehicle operating assumptions:

  • other comparative cost & time ownership factors:
    • Average of 40 miles per day traveled / Average Vehicle (all) Model Year 2021
    • Average miles driven annually:12,480 miles / 543 gallons of fuel purchased and consumed annually
    • Average miles driven annually:12,480 miles /  KWh of electricity consumed annually
    • The average cost of regular gasoline in Hawaii in May 2023: Kauai, $5.239; Wailuku, $4.840; Hilo, $4.773; and Oahu, $4.667; combined per gallon 2023 sample = $4.88 / $2,650 yearly average in ICE fuel costs
    • Average time spent for gas station ICE refueling: 15 minutes per stop
    • Average ICE annual re-Fueling stops 37 stops
    • Average time spent for EV home charging is little more than coupling and decoupling: 2 minutes per charge
    • Average EV home (full) overnight charging cycles annually = 100 per year
    • Average 6 days per week traveled, 312 vehicle travel days per year

 

Ev V Gas1

Hawaii’s EV Transition Accelerating – Part One

Update Jan 10, 2024

U.S. BEV Sales Surge in 2023

Cox Automotive said on Tuesday that Americans bought 317,168 battery-electric vehicles in the fourth quarter, up 40% from 225,865 a year ago. BEVs accounted for roughly 8% of all new car sales in the fourth quarter and between 7% and 8% of total US vehicle sales in 2023.


Originally Published Jan 2, 2024

One in Two Cars Sold Worldwide Will Have an All-Electric Powertrain by 2030

US BEV (battery electric vehicle) sales for 2023 have surpassed 1 million in the United States, with global EV sales projected to reach were more than twice that number  – it was also the first time Electric Vehicle sales exceeded that threshold in a single sales year.

The National Automobile Dealer Association (NADA) reported through first 11 months of 2023, BEV (100% electric) sales totaled 1,007,984 – an increase of 50.7% year-over-year.

Tesla alone is estimated to have delivered 1.82 million vehicles globally in 2023, up 37% from 2022, and of that total, about 473,000 vehicles in the fourth quarter. Tesla’s global EV sales numbers contradict media reports that the-sky-is-falling on EV consumer hopes and demand for electrification.

Over one million US sales in 2023 is a major milestone for the EV industry and a major step toward transportation electrification. National Automobile Dealer Association data supported the growth in EV demand with growth month-over-month increasing steadily from 6.4% of new vehicle sales in January to 7.2% in October 2023.

Still, overall, the US has lagged Europe and China in adopting EVs, and auto executives and politicians have been eager to catch up so America doesn’t lose the transportation technology race. But many auto buyers aren’t going along for the ride.

At present, EVs generally remain too costly for the average buyer with an average price of $60,544, about $13,000 more than the typical gas-fueled car, according to Edmunds Automotive.

Yet, for Hawaii, at least, the story is little different for consumers who do their homework before entirely dismissing a potential EV purchase.  Tesla’s popular mass market SUV, the Model Y, starts at $36,490 after federal EV tax credit, a price that excludes taxes and fees.  Hyundai’s appropriately named “Kona” EV for 2024 has a MSRP price of $32,675 (before taxes and fees).  An another cost consideration, EV price premiums, recently, were even more painful as interest rate loans for autos has soared. The good news, as inflation recedes so are auto loan costs.

Also many potential EV buyers, before doing their homework investigating a purchase, generally see EVs as too risky if they run out of juice with no charger in sight. As explained later in this series, that is less an issue and worry for Hawaii’s island-based residents.  Reading the tea leaves, every automotive company was full steam ahead on electrification a couple of years ago, but that momentum has slowed over the past six months.

General Motors announced it was backing down from its near-term goal of 400,000 units by mid-2024. Additionally, Ford Motor Company has halved its 2024 production guidance for its electric pickup truck, the F-150 Lightning.

Against this backdrop, Tesla’s 38% growth of such a large number is impressive. Growing large numbers isn’t easy. Increasing deliveries from 435,000 in Q3 to 484,000 in Q4 as your competitors slow? It’s a solid quarter. Tesla still sold 35 times the electric vehicles Rivian did in Q4, and unlike Rivian its sales grew sales quarter over quarter.

What does it all mean? One could argue that broader EV demand may have softened in recent months (more on this below). But rather than all EV companies suffering equally, consumers opted for the most established brand, Tesla.


Biden Policy Transforming America into a 21st Century Economy

It was 2023 which marked the best year for EV sales in our nation’s history, and with President Biden’s leadership, the enactment of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act are the key Federal Policy enablers in the transformation of America into a competitive 21st century clean tech economy.  US investments in the development and manufacturing of EV’s, batteries also are producing new and well-paying jobs within technology foundation essential to America’s global competitiveness.

Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act has also attracted $103 billion in new private sector investment announcements, including the manufacturing of EVs ($11 billion), batteries ($72 billion), as well as other areas accompanying industrial investments in battery components ($10 billion) and recycling ($4 billion).  The first IRA-related and globally competitive EV and battery factories are scheduled to open in the second half of 2024, with more coming online in 2025 and beyond.


Transitioning to EV manufacturing and products is apparently harder than it appears for conventional ICE automakers

Bloomberg reported that traditional automakers rush into the electric vehicle sector was to scale their business into EV’s, but in attempting to do it, Ford and General Motors have since opted to scale back their EV goals. Cathie Wood of ARK Investments, who current holds a large position in Tesla, stated … “We expected a lot of traditional auto manufacturers to see the writing on the wall and rush as quickly as they could into scaling big time into electric vehicles. And what has happened recently? Both GM and Ford have said, ‘We’re stepping back. We’re not going to do this until it’s profitable,’” Wood noted.

Wood’s comments about Ford and GM are quite accurate. General Motors was planning to produce 400,000 electric cars by mid-2024, but this target has been abandoned, as per CFO Paul Jacobson. The production of the electric Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra will be delayed by a year as well, as noted in a Fortune report. Ford, meanwhile, has slashed its F-150 Lightning output from 3,200 to 1,600 per week over production and demand concerns.

“The problem with that is in order to be profitable, they (Ford and GM) need to scale. That’s how this works. Their learning curve as traditional ICE (Internal Combustion Engine )vehicle makers may be longer than anticipated as they write down costs. So the fact that they’re pulling back means there’s more market share for Tesla in its growing EV leadership role, and for others who choose to go for it,” Wood said. 

Interestingly enough, the EV sector is still growing pretty well in the United States. J.D. Power has noted that about 869,000 electric cars were sold in the US in the first ten months of the year. That’s a jump of about 56% year-over-year. This jump, however, was likely driven mostly by Tesla, whose mainstream vehicles like the Model Y crossover and Model 3 sedan dominate their respective market segments.

Tesla’s lowest cost and mass-market all-electric 4-5 passenger utility vehicle is said to be in the early stages of development and projected to be priced in the $25,000 range.

Tesla Model 2The new vehicle is code name the Model 2 by the media. It is expected to incorporate the economic, manufacturing, technology lessons and growth of Tesla’s recent past and which will guide the vehicle’s development and accelerate its time-to-market. The Model 2’s low entry price is targeted at $25,000, with little compromise anticipated in vehicle utility, performance, and range compared with Tesla’s current line of luxury models.

The days of the sub-$10,000 new car are long behind us, and the days of the sub-$20,000 new car may not be far behind. But if a rock-bottom price is what buyers are looking for there is limited choice, variety, in ICE (gas-powered) models and makes.

Today’s lowest cost 2023-24 gas-powered vehicle examples:

  • Mitsubishi Mirage ES: $17,790
    Kia Rio LX: $17,875
    Nissan Versa S: $18,745
    Kia Forte LX: $20,815
    Hyundai Venue SE: $20,985
    Kia Soul LX: $21,215
    Chevrolet Trax LS: $21,495
    Nissan Sentra S: $21,725
    Hyundai Elantra SE: $22,065

But it’s the affordable $25,000 mass market vehicle price range in which Tesla is aiming at with the introduction of the all-new, all-electric, and low cost Model 2. A price point today exemplified by the 2023-24 gas-fueled Chevrolet Trailblazer and Toyota Corolla Crossover.


See part 2 of this BeyondKona exclusive story and discover…

Why going all-electric in Hawaii makes sense for many of the state’s residents today”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hawaiian Coat Of Arms

What does the Future Hold for Native Hawaiian Lands?

Native Hawaiian land claims and Governor Green’s drive to address affordable housing converge on need, but not implementation

On a one-acre farm at the foot of Maui’s dormant Haleakalā volcano, Kekoa Enomoto grows dragonfruit, pineapples, yuzu, avocado, kabocha squash and chilli peppers. She tends to a laying chicken, two honeybee hives and an aquaponics system that spawns Mexican oregano, lemongrass and tilapia.

Homesteaders like Enomoto live today similar to how Native Hawaiians did for more than a millennium, before Christian missionaries, traders and whalers arrived on the islands in the 19th century. Like other Indigenous peoples in the US, the Kānaka Maoli lived sustainably and took only what they needed from the land, growing kalo and breadfruit to feed entire villages. In the 21st century, it is more an issue for all of Hawaii’s residents (homeless and housed) in reconciling lifestyle and economic means within both changing social and climate conditions.

Prince KalanianaolePrince Johah Kuhio Kalanainaole Quote

As a beneficiary of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, a century-old program to return Native Hawaiians to their ancestral lands, Enomoto, 77, pays just $600 a month in mortgage fees for the farm and three-bedroom house where she’s lived for the past two decades. The average monthly mortgage payment in Hawaii exceeds $2,500, the second-highest among all US states.  Yet her experience cultivating, raising a family and growing old on land that is her birthright has been far from the norm for Native Hawaiians, who experience the highest rate of homelessness in one of the most expensive places on the planet.

Kuleana” is Hawaiian for ‘responsibility’, in this case, how best to develop and live on the land. Some will argue today that is what many Hawaiians believe sovereignty is all about, and what Prince Kuhio envisioned.  According to Hawaiian custom, kuleana is also only given to those who demonstrate their readiness and worthiness to handle a responsibility.


Despite accounting for only 20% of the state’s overall population, Native Hawaiians make up 50% of the unhoused population.

Dhhl LogoIn 1921, Congress passed the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, which placed 200,000 acres of land that belonged to the Hawaiian Kingdom into a trust. Anyone 18 years or older with at least 50% Native Hawaiian lineage would be eligible to obtain a 99-year land lease for $1 a year. (The leases, which are still available, can be extended by another 100 years.)

The department of Hawaiian home lands (DHHL), the state agency charged with distributing homesteads, has awarded lots to 10,000 beneficiaries. But nearly 29,000 people remain on the waitlist.  In October, the state finalized a $328m settlement agreement with 2,500 waitlisted beneficiaries who had brought a class-action lawsuit against DHHL for mismanaging the public lands trust.

Since its inception, the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act has been riddled with problems. The trust lands had been leased to sugar plantations, and only a limited portion were suitable for residential or agricultural use. A quarter of the allotted acres, in fact, were barren lava fields with limited water access that “a goat couldn’t live on”, the territorial representative William Jarrett said in 1921.

Vast portions of homestead lands also have been developed for purposes other than homesteading. For decades, public agencies have leased thousands of acres of trust lands, for little or even no compensation, to develop schools, parks, airports, military bases and other facilities.

In 1995, the state legislature passed a reparations bill, Act 14, that authorized land exchanges and $600m to settle public use controversies. But the department has continued to invest in commercial leasing projects with non-Hawaiian entities to make up for revenue shortfalls, including a stalled plan to build a casino resort in Oahu.

Hawaiian Home Lands MapAnother problem, experts say, is that the program has veered away from its goal of affordable home ownership. Residential homestead awards take several forms, including rent-to-own properties and vacant lots on which families can build their own homes. But the most sought-after option among homesteaders is buying prebuilt single-family homes on trust lands. While these turnkey houses cost about half the price of comparable homes elsewhere on the islands, they’re still prohibitively expensive for working-class families.

A 2014 DHHL study found that only 25% of waitlisted beneficiaries said they could afford the 10% down payment on a mortgage for a $150,000 property. As a result, many beneficiaries who were called off the waitlist ended up turning down home-ownership opportunities.

In Maui, there are roughly 1,400 homesteads and more than 3,800 applicants on the waitlist, including many people who were displaced by the Lahaina fire. (Locals in say it felt like a miracle that the Leialiʻi homestead community, which is close to the burn zone and houses more than 100 Native Hawaiians, was left mostly unscathed.)

In September, locals presented to DHHL an emergency proposal to build 300 solar-powered homes on a Lahaina homestead community for displaced waitlist beneficiaries. But the department’s response was lukewarm and described as “… officials weren’t accustomed to beneficiary-driven initiatives, they’re a gatekeeper and they’re obstructive.”

Kali Watson, the director of DHHL, told Hawaii Public Radio in October 2023 that the department was working with 1,400 Maui homesteaders to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs) as temporary housing for displaced family members. The department is also developing 230 new homestead lots in west Maui and has approved construction on another homestead project for next April.

Also in 2023, Governor Green signed no less than three Proclamations Relating to Affordable Housing, each designed to benefit most-lower income residents, and each prioritized state-driven affordable housing projects with the goal and intent to create thousands of new low-income and workforce housing throughout the state.

An Oily Planet

COP 28 part 2; forward into the past

COP 28 ends with a Bang and a Whimper

The UN climate summit ended on Wednesday with a compromise deal that called for a “transition away” from fossil fuels. The stronger term “phase-out” had been backed by 130 of the 198 countries negotiating in Dubai but was blocked by petrostates including Saudi Arabia.

Nearly 200 countries at the COP28 climate summit have agreed to a deal that for the first time calls on all nations to transition away from fossil fuels to avert the worst effects of climate change.

The climate agreement has been hailed as historic; first citing of fossil fuels as the root cause of the climate crisis in 30 years of climate negotiations.

But scientists said the agreement contained many loopholes and did not match the severity of the climate emergency.  Instead, it reached a compromise that called on countries to contribute to global efforts to transition “away from fossil fuels in energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science”.

The Alliance of Small Island States, representing 39 countries, said it had not been in the room when the deal was adopted as it was still coordinating its response.  Its lead negotiator, Anne Rasmussen, from Samoa, did not formally object to the agreement and believed the deal had good elements, but said the “the process has failed us” and the text included a “litany of loopholes”. “  “We have made an incremental advancement over business-as-usual when what we really needed is an exponential step change in our actions and support,” Rasmussen said.


COP28: UN climate summit ends with divisive deal

The governments of the world have agreed on a declaration at the Cop28 climate summit that has been both hailed as historic, but dismissed as weak.

  • Countries agreed on a text that encourages countries to move away from fossil fuels and quickly ramp up renewable energy

  • Island states whose homes are being washed away by rising sea levels said the text was an improvement but contains a “litany of loopholes”

  • Scientists said the document did not go far enough for world leaders to honour the promise they made to keep the planet from heating 1.5C above pre-industrial temperatures by the end of the century

  • Poorer countries said they were frustrated by the lack of a concrete plan to adapt to climate change and money to do so


During final day of the COP 28 global climate summit:

  • More countries expressed anger at the climate resolution draft text for its lack of ambition.

  • The UK’s climate minister criticized for leaving the climate conference early, without any issue resolution, described as “an outrageous dereliction of leadership at the most critical point of the conference…”

  • Campaigners warn the historic loss and damage agreement from day one of the summit remains unfinished

  • Indigenous and global south activists called out rich country ‘hypocrisy’ in pushing to phase out fossil fuels


COP28 President Sultan Al Jaber wanted his presidency to be different.

Al Jaber set his sights on the most ambitious agreement since Paris while bringing a deal home on schedule.

Less than 48 hours from the planned end of the summit on Tuesday morning, he was some way off from his ambitions – a place most COP presidents have previously found themselves at this late stage of the summit, that is … the talks weren’t making enough progress and negotiators needed to shift gear. Al Jaber also circled back to the key issue of this COP – that the final text should have language addressing the consumption of all fossil fuels for the first time… “We need to find consensus and common ground on fossil fuel,” Al Jaber said.


Leading oil producers remain opposed

More than 100 countries have said they’d support a phase-out of fossil fuels, but many, including leading oil producers, remain opposed. The hope is to forge a compromise by switching to the softer “phase down” and using adjectives like “unabated” and “orderly.”

China’s veteran envoy, Xie Zhenhua, who held extensive talks with the US team yesterday, wants to link the decline in fossil fuels to the rise in renewables.

Some participants rose to the rhetorical challenge, at least. “A fossil phase-out is the only way to save humankind,” Annalena Baerbock, Germany’s foreign minister and co-leader of the Green Party, said in an impassioned speech.

But the realities of the global transformation of dirty energy remain formidable. Saudi Arabia and other major oil exporters, like Iraq, remain set against any phase-down language – at least for now.


Draft deal is criticized as too weak by many nations in Dubai.  No surprises among the attendee stakeholders, as Saudi Arabia remains strongly opposed to fossil-fuel cuts …

A draft deal at the COP28 climate in Dubai called on countries to cut their consumption and production of fossil fuels as the hosts tried to craft a compromise less than 24 hours before the summit is due to end.

The 21-page agreement would, if adopted, be the first specifically calling for reduced use of all fossil fuels, including oil and gas, marking a historic shift in the UN treaty that governs the global fight against climate change. But for many countries it doesn’t go nearly far enough, falling short of a complete phase-out and offering nations loopholes and opt-outs.


Here are some of the noteworthy exacts from the proposed COP 28 climate summit containing 238 individual articles of agreement:

item 38 Recognizes the need to accelerate sustainable, affordable, and inclusive energy transitions … that would include, inter alia:

(a) Tripling renewable energy capacity globally and doubling the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030;

(b) Rapidly phasing down unabated coal and limitations on permitting new and unabated coal power generation;

(c) Accelerating efforts globally towards net zero emissions energy systems, utilizing zero and low carbon fuels well before or by around mid-century;

(d) Accelerating zero and low emissions technologies, including, inter alia, renewables, nuclear, abatement and removal technologies, including such as carbon capture and utilization and storage, and low carbon hydrogen production, so as to enhance efforts towards substitution of unabated fossil fuels in energy systems.

(e) Reducing both consumption and production of fossil fuels, in a just, orderly and equitable manner so as to achieve net zero by, before, or around 2050 in keeping with the science;

(f) Accelerating and substantially reducing non-CO2 emissions, including, in particular, methane emissions globally by 2030;

(g) Accelerating emissions reductions from road transport through a range of pathways, including development of infrastructure and rapid deployment of zero and low emission vehicles;

(h) Phasing out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption and do not address energy poverty or just transitions, as soon as possible;

item 95 Highlights the growing gap between the needs of developing country Parties, in particular those due to the increasing impacts of climate change compounded by difficult macroeconomic circumstances, and the support provided and mobilized for their efforts to implement their nationally determined contributions, highlighting that such needs are currently estimated at USD 5.8–5.9 trillion for the pre-2030 period

item 103 – Emphasizes the importance of scaled up public finance and urges developed country Parties to urgently and significantly scale up their provision of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity;

item 194 – Recognizes the importance of international collaboration in enhancing climate action across all actors of society, sectors and regions, including transboundary cooperation, in contributing to progress towards the goals of the Paris Agreement; and urges Parties and nonParty stakeholders to join efforts to accelerate delivery through inclusive international collaboration;

item 232  Emphasizes Parties’ collective commitment to promote international cooperation to address implementation gaps and ensure comprehensive responses to climate change, in the context of sustainable development


COP 28 – Climate Quote of the Day

“The Republic of the Marshall Islands did not come here to sign our death warrant,” said John Silk, head of delegation for the Marshall Islands, a nation at risk from rising sea levels. “What we have seen today is unacceptable. We will not go silently to our watery graves.”

Climate Temp Rise Nasa

An Oily Planet

COP 28 part 1; a climate reckoning or cop-out

EDITORIAL UPDATE: Dec. 8th, 2023

Today’s growing Climate Crisis is taking all of humankind, regardless of wealth or means, along with most other living things on planet Earth on the path to extinction.

Climate Change Before & AfterYes, extinction is a strong word until one takes the time to review the in-depth scientific findings of human-induced planet-warming. The results of the science are conclusive; a global heating effect is modifying the climate and ny extension, weather predictability (historic in human terms) and stability, impacting both traditional seasons and weather.  This growing body of scientific evidence points to climate-conclusive changes now underway and their projected outcome.

The climate change verdict is out: GUILTY, human-caused burning of fossil fuels has placed our dependency on planetary norms in to a global death spiral. Not since the Holocene period aka the Age of Humans which began about 9,700 years ago has Earth gone through climate changes as the current speed of change, compounded by ever growing GHG emissions in the atmosphere and within the world’s oceans.

The issue of global heating has gone, yes, global, and the COP summit format is evidence of the world’s attention.  COP did not happen in vacuum. After a lot of public alarm, the global ratification Paris Climate Accords in 2015, COP (Conference of the Parties) became the next-step vehicle for countries to how best to determine and enact the Paris accords in the transition to global clean energy economy.  It also took time and growing public awareness, outside of the world of petro-chemical interests, to conclude that climate action was needed and now: “…something has to be done before it’s too late!” 

A consensus response to actions which must be taken sooner, not later was only part of the challenge.  There are conflicting interests and contentious issues among all the stakeholders, and this current COP summit hosted by fossil fuel stakeholders is a case in point.  Yet, beyond natural barriers to progress, COP is also an opportunity for vested parties to come together on common points of interest, and the threat and realization of climate impacts is now universal, regardless of what you might imagine between governments, science-based climate interests, and competing industrial sectors pitting their profit interests against the future of humanity.

This year’s COP 28 conference is hosted by the oil and gas interests of Dubai.

The current global climate summit got off to rocky start as an excise in arrogance rather than common sense, when the event’s host Sultan Al Jaber, who is also Dubai’s state oil CEO, said this week that “…the phase-out of fossil fuels would take world ‘back into caves” and that “…there is no scientific evidence supporting the phase-out of fossil fuels”… for clean energy alternatives available today, and in the future.

It seems sultan like the words “phased-down” and not out, implying so long as no actionable deadlines to transition off fossil fuels we be put in place, he was all for the summit and its lofty (as many see it) achievable climate goals.

Crazy Oil ArabBut, this year’s climate summit has also came at a time when 2023 has proven to be the hottest year on record, and a reminder to COP attendees, not only scientists, policy makers, and climate issue specialists, and the fossil fuel interests alike (bankers and other pollution profiteers), that being further comforted knowing the “climate” event is hosted by one of their own, and in one of the largest fossil fuel producing countries in the world, Dubai, may not be enough to hold back rising temperatures and a climate reality, nor a growing  consensus that one action is worth a thousand words – and fossil fuels have to go!

As opportunity and time run out for actionable global heating remediation, it is shaping up to be a battle for meaningful actions to taken or transition opportunities lost at COP 28.

We can always close our eyes to the world around us, and continue down a path of business-as-usual. But it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the path of irreversible global climate  consequences we have placed ourselves on. It is no longer a question of if, but when — and that’s something even the Sultan fears most.

The clean or dirty energy choices we make now will determine the livability and outcome for every person alive today.  And, if we fail to address this global emergency driven by a 20th century dirty energy economy, the rising costs to society and the environment will be simply unsustainable.

Then there are the diminishing energy benefits from petroleum-gas-coal based energy sources. Rising production, environmental and climate costs point to a dead-end path, and that path is now in sight.

Everyone owns this problem, and anyone believing we can afford to stay the course is increasingly finding a shrinking consensus for cheerleading our present and ongoing reliance on global dirty energy monopolies, their energy sources, and market dependencies they created. People talk of addressing today’s societal inequities, there is no greater wealth inequality than the wealth gap between fossil fuel suppliers and their energy-dependent users.

Disappearing property insurance

American homeowners already coping with extreme weather now face a new risk: disappearing property insurance. Private companies have increasingly reduced coverage, concluding that the risks—and potential losses—threatened by climate change outweigh probable profits.  Insurers have increasingly raised fees and reduced coverage, concluding that the risks—and potential losses—threatened by climate change outweigh probable profits

We are entering an age of rising climate costs (directly and indirectly) paid for by both consumers and the planet. The thought that a five cent per gallon increase at the pump will have people up in arms, but ignore the linkage to rising climate risks loaded not only into their direct energy costs, but by extension and example, the present rising turmoil in P&C Insurance market. The Property and Casualty insurance sector now sees costs and risks in different light, as Climate-related claims rise. It has been, until recently, the elephant in the room most people failed to see.

With P&C operating costs now skyrocketing with climate risks and claims on the rise, Insurers are now leaving higher climate risk states, as California is experiencing. The recent deadly Maui fire was a wake-up call for everyone, including within the P&C insurance sector which traditionally thought off Hawaii in terms hurricane risks, and as Hawaii’s Gov. Green recently acknowledged.

Climate Property Insurnace Impacts 1Rising P&C insurance costs are directly linked to housing (and the real estate market in total). Rising insurance costs, and the question of future property insurance costs, and even availability, is just one more example tied to costs of global heating and increasing cost of living factors, which translates into rising insurance costs added into their rent or mortgage payments, into food costs, and into their health costs. Altogether, failure to see the bigger and impactful picture of an economy based on fossil fuels, and continuing to live with fossil fuels wold’s primary energy source.

Today’s fossil fuel dependencies are further propped-up by false and obsolete economic subsidies and assumptions designed to serve a highly enriched industrial sector of the global economy lined with vested interests.  Global taxpayers subsidize annually the fossil industrial sector to the tune of over 7 (seven) Trillion dollars (USD), and those added costs due not include climate heating cost impacts to the global economy and consumers, and the . added pollution and heating the planet. It is an energy path taken, and its past time to get off.  Fossil fuels do not need further and massive taxpayer subsidies or be allowed to continue to operate with unabated immunity to the compounding planetary costs and impacts they have created and are creating.

Just one of many real world cause and effect climate examples now underway is are climate-heating impacts now driving droughts now affecting 1.84 billion people throughout the world, according to COP summit findings. And, 85% of the people directly affected are living in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), increasingly linked to social conflicts driven by climate change-induced droughts coupled to social and economic upheaval.

Global food chains are also impacted in the growing combination of factors ranging fueled by rising climate-driven weather global impacts and droughts.

BeyondKona has covered the subject of so-called “Global Warming” since our local publication began in 2017.  We have covered the causes and effects of this human-induced crisis affecting the entire planet, Hawaii more specifically.  BeyondKona will continue the subject coverage simply because, one; it affects everyone, and two; is too important an issue to ignore with the climate future of Hawaii and the world now at stake.

 

Bill Bugbee

BeyondKona, Publisher


COP 28 – Recap of Developments; week one:

Day 1: Delegates from nearly 200 countries agreed on details for running the loss and damage fund, a facility designed to help vulnerable countries deal with more extreme weather stoked by global warming.

Day 2: COP28 President Sultan Al Jaber announced the United Arab Emirates will put $30 billion into a climate finance fund called Alterra, which he dubbed a “vehicle like no other.”

Day 3: Exxon Mobil Corp. and Saudi Arabia’s Aramco led a pledge by 50 oil and gas producers to cut emissions from their own operations. Darren Woods was at the summit to discuss the news — marking the first time an Exxon CEO attended a COP.

  • Vice President Kamala Harris announced the United States was providing $3 billion in climate aid to poorer nations.

Day 4: The World Bank said it’s working with a club of 15 finance bosses to lower the risk of investing in climate projects in emerging economies and attract private capital for cutting emissions.

Day 5: The COP28 president found “no science” to support the phase out of fossil fuels to keep warming below 1.5C, Al Jaber said he was misunderstood. At a press conference he was joined on stage by Jim Skea, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Day 6: US Climate Envoy John Kerry criticized “…US oil producers for not doing enough to combat global warming” and singled out Chevron Corp. for particular scrutiny. Meanwhile, former Vice President Al Gore said reforms are needed to weaken petrostates’ power at COP. His comments came after Saudi Arabian Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said the kingdom won’t agree to a text that calls for the phase down of fossil fuels.

Day 7: Vladimir Putin flew into the UAE — his first trip to the Middle East since he invaded Ukraine — to discuss energy. While he steered clear of COP, the Russian president’s presence in the country was on everyone’s mind at the summit.


In sync with COP 28, President Biden requested more than $11 billion annually to help developing countries cope with the ravages of climate change and transition to clean energy. But lawmakers have so far failed to deliver the funding, with House Republicans voicing steadfast opposition.

A little-known U.S. agency has been leveraging the president’s plan through private-sector partnerships to deliver billions of dollars in climate finance for developing countries. The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, or DFC, provided $3.7 billion in international climate finance in fiscal year 2023, that equals than a third of President Biden’s original request. “It’s work that, in the aggregate, that has become the backbone of the U.S. government’s overall effort to mobilize climate financing to developing economies,” Jake Levine, DFC’s chief climate officer, revealed.

Ff Pollution

Five Takeaways from Sweeping US Climate Report

“The impacts of climate change are continuing to change faster than we expected them to.”

It’s increasing the urgency for both mitigating greenhouse gases and also implementing adaptation efforts to help us adapt, because we’re not slowing down [warming] anytime soon”… Kris May, Chief executive officer of Pathways Climate Institute in San Francisco.

Us Cliamte Report1A Fifth National Climate Assessment report issued today by the US government describes how intensifying climate change is disrupting lives and businesses nationwide, even as communities in every state ramp up their response to the crisis: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/11/14/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-releases-fifth-national-climate-assessment-and-announces-more-than-6-billion-to-strengthen-climate-resilience-across-the-country/

The over 2,000 page report offers a climate-themed tour of the country, identifying the impacts plaguing every region, how communities are increasingly protecting themselves and how much more action is needed to ensure a safer future. The fifth edition of the report follows the fourth edition, which was published in phases in 2017 and 2018; the first assessment appeared in 2000.

Here are the five main takeaways:

  1. Climate impacts are here, getting worse and costing a lot of money 

The first sentence of Chapter 1 summarizes the nation’s sobering reality: “The effects of human-caused climate change are already far-reaching and worsening across every region of the United States.” A small taste of what that means: Warming is happening everywhere, and nighttime temperatures are rising faster than daytime temperatures in most places.

Us Cliamte Report2Minor and moderate coastal flooding is also on the rise along most Atlantic and Gulf coastlines, while a combination of rising seas and flooding from high tides and big storms is projected for the the mid-pacific and Hawaiian island chain. Meanwhile, warmer winters are contributing to declining snowpack levels in the Northwest, affecting water supplies.

But the most devastating way people experience climate change is in the form of major disasters. Between 2018 and 2022, the country experienced 89 disasters that each cost at least $1 billion in damages — a mix of droughts, floods, severe storms, tropical cyclones, wildfires and winter storms. During that period, Texas alone experienced $375 billion in disaster damages.

  1. Certain communities are at higher risk 

No one living in the US is safe from climate change, but low-income communities and people of color are disproportionately at risk of experiencing damaging impacts. In the South, for example, neighborhoods home to racial minorities and low-income people have the highest inland exposure to flooding, concludes the report. Moreover, the report adds, “Black communities nationwide are expected to bear a disproportionate share of future flood damages — both inland and coastal.”

  1. Climate solutions are already being deployed nationwide

Knowing the source of the problem (emissions from burning fossil fuels) means we also know how to stop it: by transitioning from fossil fuels to cleaner forms of energy, and possibly by using a mix of natural and manmade processes to pull carbon dioxide and other emissions directly out of the air.

Efforts are already well underway. “Annual US greenhouse gas emissions fell 12% between 2005 and 2019,” largely due to natural gas replacing coal for some electricity generation, the report states. Between roughly 2010 and 2022, cumulative onshore wind capacity, utility-scale solar and EV sales have all gone up nationwide as costs associated with these low-carbon technologies have dropped.

Homes with rooftop solar panels in Rocklin, California. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

  1. Today’s efforts aren’t nearly enough to halt a global climate crisis

Back in 2015, the US joined the Paris Agreement, agreeing to limit future global warming to well below 2C, ideally to 1.5C, compared to preindustrial levels. President Joe Biden then set a national target for the US to cut its emissions by at least 50% by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. Now the reality check: The world is on track to warm above 2C, in part because the US — the second-biggest current emitter and largest historical emitter — is not on pace to meet its goals.

US net emissions would have to fall by more than 6% each year on average to meet existing targets, according to the report. In contrast, US emissions fell by less than 1% per year, on average, between 2005 and 2019.

  1. What now? It depends on us

Us Climate Report 3The more warming there is, the worse the impacts will be. Science can’t tell us exactly how hot the planet will get because that depends on what we — society as a whole but especially our political leaders — decide to do. In the US, and elsewhere in the world, people have a choice right now to do more to cut their carbon footprint and prevent much worse warming.

“How much more the world warms depends on the choices societies make today,” states the report. “The future is in human hands.”

Beyond Kona Climate Feed

2023 is turning out to be the hottest year ever recorded

2023 Global Heating GlobeGlobal sea surface temperatures broke new record highs, and Antarctic sea ice continues its unprecedented meltdown.


The ‘safe’ threshold for global warming will be passed in just 6 years

New research suggests we have just six years left to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, and less than two decades to keep temperatures below the make or break 2 C threshold outlined in the science of the Paris Agreement the world signed off on in 2015.

Researchers also found that if emissions continue at the current rate, we will cross this threshold before the end of the decade, according to a study published Monday (Oct. 30) in the journal Nature Climate Change.

The climate clock is ticking down to zero hour, and Hawaii is NOT prepared…

If global carbon emissions continue on track to exceed safe limits by 2030 they will unleash the worst effects of climate change, as new research suggests. All these changes translated down to just six years left for humankind to change course and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“Our planet has just endured a season of simmering — the hottest summer on record,” U.N. secretary-general António Guterres said in a statement. “Climate breakdown has begun.”

A new estimate of our remaining carbon budget — the amount of carbon dioxide we can produce while keeping global temperatures below a dangerous threshold — indicates that, as of January, if we emit more than 276 gigatons (250 metric gigatons) of CO2 we will hit temperatures 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.

 

Climate Change Before & AfterIt’s real. It’s happening. It’s accelerating. And it’s our fault. Human activity — particularly the production of greenhouse gasses from fossil fuel emissions — it is reshaping our planet, and Hawaii will not escape the effects of rapid environmental change now occurring at rates never seen before, certainly since humans walked the Earth.

As global temperature averages creep upward these changes are transforming the oceans of the world.  Seas are warming, rising and becoming more acidic, compounded by extreme weather events such as droughts, wildfires, floods and powerful storms which are now commonplace.

These global heating impacts means that even Hawaii, with its remote mid-pacific location, will not be exempt from global changes in temperature, climate, and weather.


RECOMMENDED READING:

Goodell 2023 Climate BookThe Heat Will Kill You First (2023) warns that extreme heatwaves are becoming more common and are dramatically altering life as we know it – they’re an existential danger. Rising temperatures are already changing the planet, shortening seasons and intensifying disasters.

The world is waking up to a new reality: wildfires are now seasonal from California to Hawaii, the Northeast is getting less and less snow each winter, and the ice sheets in the Arctic and Antarctica are melting fast with multiple consequences.

Heat is the first order threat that drives all other impacts of the climate crisis. And as the temperature rises, it is revealing fault lines in our governments, our politics, our economy, and our values.

The basic science is not complicated: Stop burning fossil fuels tomorrow, and the global temperature will stop rising tomorrow. Stop burning fossil fuels in 50 years, and the temperature will keep rising for 50 years, making parts of our planet virtually uninhabitable. It’s up to us. The hotter it gets, the deeper and wider our fault lines will open.