Dc Storm

‘This is a coup’: Trump and Musk’s purge is cutting more than costs, say experts

Slashing staff, disabling entire agencies, the newly empowered Trump administration is lacerating the very structures of US democracy …

Trump and Elon Musk’s radical drive to slash billions of dollars in annual federal spending with huge job and regulatory cuts is spurring charges that they have made illegal moves while undercutting congressional and judicial powers, say legal experts and state attorneys general.

Staff at the Federal Aviation Administration receive emails today (2/17) stating they have been fired, upending rotas during period of busy air travel and chronic qualified staff storages and impacting air travel safety.

Trump’s fusillade of executive orders expanding his powers in some extreme ways in his cost-cutting fervor, coupled with unprecedented drives by the Musk-led so-called “department of government efficiency” (Doge) to slash many agency workforces and regulations, have created chaos across the US government and raised fears of a threat to US democracy.

Trump and Musk have also attacked judges who have made rulings opposing several of their moves after they ended up in court, threatening at least one with impeachment and accusing him of improper interference.

“In the US, we appeal rulings we disagree with – we don’t ignore court orders or threaten judges with impeachment just because we don’t like the decision. This is a coup, plain and simple,” Arizona’s attorney general, Kris Mayes, said.

But some Democrats might envy the speed at which Trump and his team cut through red tape. After all, liberal lawmakers have for years complained about bureaucracy that moved too slowly and rules that stifled their ambitions.  One such Democrat was Joe Biden. Toward the end of his term as president, he said his administration was too slow to roll out his clean energy economy infrastructure law. “Historians will talk about (how) great the impact was,” Biden told USA Today last month. “But it didn’t have any immediate impact on people’s lives.”

Trump and Musk, the world’s richest man and Trump’s largest single donor, now face multiple rebukes from judges and legal experts to the regulatory and staff cuts they have engineered at the treasury department, the US Agency for International Development and several other agencies.

Trump Musk

Incongruously, as Trump has touted Musk’s cost-cutting work as vital to curbing spending abuses, one of Trump’s first moves in office last month was to fire 17 veteran agency watchdogs, known as inspectors general, whose jobs have long been to ferret out waste, fraud and abuse in federal departments.

Those firings were done without giving Congress the legally required 30 days’ notice and specific justifications for each one, prompting mostly Democratic outrage at Trump’s move, which he defended as due to “changing priorities”, and falsely claimed was “standard”.

In response to the firings, eight of those inspectors general filed a lawsuit against Trump and their department heads on Wednesday arguing their terminations violated federal laws designed to protect them from interference with their jobs and seeking reinstatement.

The IGs who sued included ones from the Departments of Defense, Education and Health and Human Services.

“I think their claims that they’re going after waste, fraud and abuse is a complete smokescreen for their real intentions,” the Democratic senator Sheldon Whitehouse said.

Likening Trump’s firing of the IGs to “firing cops before you rob the bank”, Whitehouse stressed: “It’s pretty clear that what’s going on here is a very deliberate effort to create as much wreckage in the government as they can manage with a view to helping out the big Trump donors and special interests who find government obnoxious in various ways.”

On another legal track opposing Trump and Musk’s actions, many of the nation’s 23 state Democratic attorneys general have escalated legal battles against Doge’s actions and sweeping cost cutting at treasury, USAid and other agencies.

For instance, 19 Democratic AGs sued Trump and the treasury secretary in February to halt Doge from accessing sensitive documents with details about tens of millions of Americans who get social security checks, tax refunds and other payments, arguing that Doge was violating the Administrative Procedures Act. The lawsuit prompted a New York judge on 7 February to issue a temporary order halting Doge from accessing the treasury payments system.

In response, Musk and Trump lashed out by charging judicial interference. Musk on his social media platform Twitter/X where he has more than 200 million followers charged that the judge was “corrupt” and that he “needs to be impeached NOW”.

Legal experts, AGs and top congressional Democrats say that Trump’s and Musk’s charges of improper judicial interference and some of their actions pose dangers to the rule of law and the US constitution.

This story is an excerpt from the Guardian and New York Times: 02/17/25
Truth Lies

The New Reality

Dc Storm

One of the key talking points of the 2024 election results (often repeated by Republicans and President Trump) and justification for the political rollercoaster ride the nation has experienced since Trump and the GOP took control of all three branches of government last month, goes like this … President Trump has an election mandate. A more truthful statement in this case would be …winner takes all.

The 2024 election results favoring Donald Trump were anything but a national mandate for Trump or his party claim. The 2024 election results favoring Trump produce a winner with less than 50% of the vote, and less than a 1.6% percent majority of the popular vote — hardly a national mandate, but enough votes to squeak across the finish line and onto the presidency.

As president, Trump can and does anything he likes with no political repercussions, so far at least. The daily chaos of his administration is simply following Steve Bannon’s election playbook; if you win… “flood the zone”.

Trump and his agents of chaos have indeed flooded the zone with executive orders without much consequential forthought.  Voters on both side of the political fence generally agree that government (and the private sector) can both benefit from less waste, greater efficiency, and operate with lower costs where possible.

The claims of vast fraud exists throughout key Federal agencies – an allegation without substance is one totally false, and otherwise unfounded.  But, it is still a repeated taking point of Trump and his minions without supporting facts to back up such wild claims, yet some believe it to be true true because they have told it is so.

Somewhere lost in translation is any consideration towards greater accountability in governance.  The very thing America’s founding fathers had in mind freeing the Country from the rule of King George III, and transforming the American colonies into a Democracy governed by its people, free of tyranny, and English taxes.


Project 2025 – the Trump Administration’s Disruptive Playbook

In the 21st century, America has been and remains the global leader in ending the tyranny represented by dictatorships since the end of Second World War and in advancing the international rule-of-law through freedom and democratic reforms. America’s leadership was not limited to addressing the global challenges following the end WWII.

For nearly 80 years, the USA has taken the lead role in advancing global stability and democracy.  America’s 2024 national election was less a turning point, and more (as some have describe it) a fork in the road. In Trump’s case, that fork in road is an opportunity to remake America into his image, following the Project 2025 playbook written by the far-right think tank; the Heritage Foundation.

Most Americans have not read the foundation’s playbook written for Trump and his party. But Project 2025, since Trump and his administration were sworn into office has been the GOP’s script for remaking America in “their image”. More than an outline, “Project 2025” is today’s GOP roadmap.

The Project 2025 Presidential Transition Project was a well-funded (eight-figure) effort published by the Heritage Foundation with more than 100 organizations participating in a future vision of an America with the most anti-democratic presidential administration in modern times. It is mandate and call to take swift, far-right actions that would cut wages for working people, dismantle environmental, climate, and social safety net programs, and to redefine the way our society operates.

Popular national policies and trends supporting the current national and global transition into a clean energy economy are to be sweep away, beginning with Trump’s very first national policy statement upon being sworn to the nation, drill-baby-drill (for oil and gas) with the promise to roll-back America’s back to it unfettered hey days of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Trump was merely following the Project 2025 playbook on energy, which is to roll back the clock on climate science and clean energy technologies, increase oil and gas profit subsidies and turning America into the next Saudi Arabia.  Not factored in this energy policy of abandon are the public costs of such an about face on climate science and pollution abatement technologies. It is an energy policy of which will be measured in many impactful ways beyond the direct social and climate costs of a cheaper gallon of gas, and greater profits for an industry with little regard to the impacts of their outdated energy business practices.

Trump in the following the Project 2025 script, recently appointed fossil fuel CEO Chris Wright appointed as Energy Secretary, who vows to “unleash” US fossil fuel development at a scale not seen since the 1920’s. As energy secretary, Wright is expected to promote President Trump’s efforts to achieve U.S. “energy dominance” through dirty energy dominance lead by the United States, and at a global scale.

The Project 2025 playbook further calls for President Trump to not only roll-back progress, it calls for the eventual demise of key Federal agencies responsible for protecting and reporting on escalating climate threats to the nation and the planet, while protecting Americans health from the social impacts of pollution and industrial-linked diseases.   The Project 2025 playbook specifically targets key Federal agencies responsible for the economic and social welfare of the nation.  One example closer to home is NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration).

NOAA plays a critical role in helping Hawaii, and the nation understand the effects of human behavior on the world’s oceans and atmosphere.  NOAA issues “daily weather forecasts,” “severe storm warnings,” and more. It also monitors and reports on climate changes, manages fisheries, restores coastal environments, and supports marine commerce. According to NOAA, the agency’s “products and services support economic vitality and affect more than one-third of America’s gross domestic product.

Project 2025’s policy agenda would also trade the federal government’s vast institutional knowledge and forward momentum on climate solutions for dangerous climate denialism and obstructionism. These policy proposals threaten America’s role as a leader in the global clean energy transition, supported by Inflation Reduction Act investments that have ignited job creation and economic growth in communities across the world

For details on Project 2025, BeyondKona recommends reading and referring to : https://democracyforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024-05_Peoples-Guide-Pro-2025.pdf  

One final thought …

As Trump and his team — most notably Elon Musk — run roughshod over legal and ethical boundaries, it’s been hard not to notice how unprepared the Federal government system is prepared for the internal threat now unfolding in Washington D.C.

One would in fact be justified in assuming that Trump’s failures to comply with the law might trigger no repercussions whatsoever, just as they didn’t during his first term in office and largely didn’t during his interregnum.

Presently, significant questions remain unanswered.  Who will police the new president and his loyalist political party in complete control of all branches of government in 2025?  Barring an outbreak of self-respect at the Capitol, the answers are unsatisfying.

There are the courts, though that path tends to be slow and deliberative, and depends on respect for the courts’ authority, something Trump has demonstrated repeatedly he does not have respect for any legal system which challenges his actions.

America has also repeatedly demonstrated over history a surprising ability to self-correct itself in times of national challenge — now is certainly one of those times…



Hawaii’s economic dependency and recent relationship with the U.S. federal government

Hawaii historically received significant federal aid, loans, and financial assistance. The state has received billions in new federal funding for various programs and initiatives udinr the Biden administration, but has changed with the election.

Here are some, not all, specific examples of recent and anticipated Federal funding rollbacks impacting Hawaii’s economy, now in jeopardy with a new administration with very different national priorities:

2023 Federal dollars flowing to Hawaii in the form of economic support
  1. Homelessness Assistance: $4 billion was allocated nationwide, with Hawaii receiving a portion of this funding.
  2. Small Business Loans: The U.S. Small Business Administration provided more than $151.2 million in federal disaster loans for Hawaii businesses impacted by the Maui wildfires.
  3. Homeowner and Renter Assistance: More than $244.7 million was provided to homeowners and renters to help them rebuild and recover from the Maui wildfires.
  4. Maui Wildfire Recovery: FEMA and federal partners were on track to provide approximately $3 billion towards Maui wildfire recovery.
  5. State and Local Government Support: In fiscal year 2021, Hawaii received about $6.2 billion in federal transfers to state and local governments, which likely continued or increased in 2023.
  6. Unemployment Benefits: $808,419,350 was allocated for repayment of a U.S. Department of Treasury loan to pay for unemployment benefits.
  7. Disaster Declaration Funding: Following the August 2023 wildfires, President Biden approved a disaster declaration, making federal funding available for temporary housing, home repairs, and other recovery efforts.

While the exact total for 2023 is not provided in the search results, these figures indicate that Hawaii received several billion dollars in federal aid, loans, and financial assistance throughout the year.

2024 Federal dollars flowing to Hawaii in the form of economic support

The new federal funding will support several specific projects in Hawaii:

  1. Broadband Connectivity: A $72 million grant from the Biden-Harris Administration will expand broadband connectivity on Hawaiian home lands, bringing high-speed internet to thousands of DHHL lessees throughout the state.
  2. Coastal Resilience Projects: Over $8 million in grant funding will support projects on Oahu, Maui, and Molokai, including:
    • Tipu Tipu Restoration and Sustainability ($3.1 million) to implement nature-based practices for sediment erosion prevention.
    • Department of Land and Natural Resources ($1.67 million) to protect and restore native vegetation.
    • Healthy Climate Communities ($1 million) to restore 5 acres of land with 2,000 native trees in the Puu O Ehu watershed.
    • Hawaii Department of Transportation ($1 million) to engage Oahu communities on resilience needs for coastal highways and communities.
  3. Affordable Housing Infrastructure: A $6.6 million federal grant will be used to design infrastructure for high-density residential areas on neighbor islands, including around public housing on Maui and the Big Island.
  4. Community Health Centers: A projected $1.3 million increase in funding for Hawaii’s 14 federally-qualified community health centers2.
  5. Native Hawaiian Education and Community Development: $5 million for Native Hawaiian-serving institutions and $1 million for non-profit organizations supporting Native Hawaiian communities.
  6. Energy Transitions Initiative: $15 million (shared with Puerto Rico) to help remote and island communities design clean energy and resilience solutions.
  7. Ocean Carbon Removal Research: A portion of $10 million nationwide funding for research into biological processes like using kelp or algae to manage carbon emissions.

The above 2023-24 federally funded projects through the previous Biden Administration were designed to address and improve Hawaii’s infrastructure, housing, healthcare, education, and environmental resilience across the state.

The future of Federal funding as exemplified by the previous Biden administration remain in doubt under the Trump administration, and certainly did not fit within the Project 2025 profile for qualified Federal priorities.

An Oily Planet

Big Oil’s Political Pay Back

“We have something that no other manufacturing nation will ever have, the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we are going to use it,” Trump’s 2025 inaugural address.

The US and global fossil fuel sectors saw a return on their investment in the US 2024 political cycle as nothing seen before in the political history of the United States.  A record amount of money was spent by big oil to influence the 2024 US Presidential election outcome and other target political races in order to stay in control of America’s energy policy.   It might be considered just good business practice to protect the self-interest and influence control America’s fossil fuel industry has over government policy.

In the end, nearly 1 billion in US campaign dollars was spent this past by oil-gas and other fossil fuel sector interests on 2024 candidate races, issues, and from the US presidential race on down. It was the largest politically-funded influence campaign in modern US political history, and for the benefactors it appears to have paid off.

Follow the Money

A stunning $445m was donated and spent throughout the 2024 election cycle to elect Donald Trump President, and influence outcomes of targeted congressional races. Fossil fuel companies and their trade groups also spent another $243m lobbying Congress during this same period.  For these fossil fuel donors, representing the global dirty energy interests, with the election win of Donald Trump to the US presidency was the grand prize.

Big Oil MoneyFossil fuel interests successfully purchased the grand prize, the presidency and at bargain rates in terms of influencing an about face in national energy policy from a developing national clean energy economy, and full reverse backwards to 20th century fossil fuel dependent economy, but with a 21st century climate impact price tag.  The US oil and gas industrial sector stands to heavily profit from the new Trump administration’s national Trump-directed energy mantra, “drill baby drill”.

The money influence from this past election cycle extends far beyond the presidential race with ongoing influence throughout the new administration.  From Senate-confirmed Trump cabinet appointees, such as Chris Wright, the fracking CEO who was tapped to head the Department of Energy, and Lee Zeldin, the former New York representative who has accepted more than $400,000 in fossil fuel-tied campaign donations and who will lead the Environmental Protection Agency.

An additional $688 million dollars in political funding is a figure (fossil fuel funding from January 2023 and November 2024) range from political donations, lobbying and advertising to support elected officials, specific races and energy policies weighted to vested fossil fuel interests.  This figure does not include, however, additional money funneled through dark-money groups – which do not have to reveal their donors. It is almost certainly a vast understatement, according to a report from green advocacy group Climate Power, whose data findings are based on campaign finance disclosures and advertising industry data.

Individual fossil fuel donors interests also poured an additional $96 million into Donald Trump’s 2024 re-election campaign and affiliated political action committees, much of that was covered by megadonor oil billionaires, such as the fracking magnate Harold Hamm, the pipeline mogul Kelcy Warren and the drilling tycoon Jeffery Hildebrand.  Additional contributions came from lesser-known oil and gas interests, including fossil fuel-trading hedge funds, mining corporations and the producers of offshore-drilling ships and fuel tanks.

Big oil interest groups further spent some $80 million on advertising to support their interests in the 2024 clection cycle. That includes funding for ad campaigns run in swing states, such as one from the refining lobbying organization American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (which falsely railed against Joe Biden’s pro-electric vehicle policies, and another eight-figure ad blitz from top US oil lobbying group the American Petroleum Institute that promoted the idea that fossil fuels are the “only” “vital energy source” able to support global energy security.

None of these campaigns specifically endorsed Trump, but targeted audiences in swing states inclined to vote for Trump, thus shoring up his incomprehensible support of fossil fuels ahead of all other energy options, particularly America’s ongoing success in an effective transition to clean energy replacements for oil and gas.

Oil and gas companies and trade groups further spent more than $25m on Republican down-ballot races, including $16m on House races, $8m on Senate fights and more than $500,000 on GOP gubernatorial candidates. These targeted investments are “likely to pay dividends”, the report says, with Republicans now in full control of the White House, House and Senate – as well as key fossil fuel vested states.

The newly installed President Donald Trump unleashed immediately after taking office dozens of pro-fossil fuel executive actions following the Project 2025 playbook for power, most executive orders issues by Trump defy both logic and reason when it comes a national 21st century energy path. He is also expected to pursue a vast array of other actions which climate science facts and findings and shut down progress target on clean energy replacement opportunities now underway, and all with the help of well-funded, and Republican-control, Congress.

Chile Forest Fires Global Heating

Trump’ promise to “drill, baby, drill” is more than post-campaign retroic, it in fact is the mantra of a misguided and powerful president, who has clearly stated he will remove limits on the already booming fossil fuel industry, with a mission to reverse former President Biden’s successful climate impact response and clean energy transition.

Examples of energy policy flip-flop took the form of Presidential orders without due process last week which pulled back approval of new wind leases, lifted key restrictions on fossil fuel extraction, cut off money dedicated to electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and cam with a Presidential promise to clawback IRA money now funding a national transition to clean and climate-resilient energy economy.

Legal experts said the president was testing the boundaries of executive power with aggressive orders designed to stop the country from transitioning to renewable energy.  The legality of last week’s wave of presidential mandates (without due process) remains to be seen.  Climate advocates and the scientific community are already preparing for the worst, a reversal of an effective and essential 21st century national response to a changing climate – and to a threat increasingly dangerous and costly to all living things on Earth.


Co2 Chart Jan 2025

Truth Lies

Trump Presidency; round two

Yes, today (Monday, January 20, 2025) is a nation holiday, but not for the reasons some may think or mistakenly assign it to the Presidential Inauguration ceremony of the newly ratified 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump.  Instead it is a national holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr.

For Donald Trump his inauguration today and return to the Presidency was an act of retribution and validation not traditionally associated with Presidential Inaugurations.

 The 47th president’s 29-minute address on Monday, just after noon ET, painted a familiar Trump theme of a country in disarray, one seized by “years of a radical and corrupt establishment,” with the pillars of society “broken and seemingly in complete disrepair.”  Trump went on to say that America “cannot manage even a simple crisis at home, while at the same time stumbling into a continuing catalog of catastrophic events abroad.”

The reality counter-balance to the newly inaugurated President’s rant was its misleading and incomplete assessment of a country that has had under the previous leadership (President Biden) a growing economy, falling inflation, slowing illegal immigration, a record-breaking stock market, the lowest levels of violent crime in years, a revolutionary national clean energy policy advancing the County’s energy economy, lowering of consumer energy prices at home, and a military that has limited engagement in conflicts around the world.

Trump Biden PicTrump’s message to the Country earlier today went to the core of his political appeal: convincing his supporters that he — and he alone — can fix what ails (or does not ail) the country. And it represented a reprise of how he framed his first presidency — as a constant fight against enemies, foreign and domestic.

“My recent election is a mandate to completely and totally reverse a horrible betrayal and all of these many betrayals that have taken place and to give the people back their faith, their wealth, their democracy and, indeed, their freedom from this,” President Donald Trump told the Country on Monday, and what proved to be the longest inaugural address in modern history.  “America’s decline is over,” he declared.

Eight years ago, Mr. Trump described “mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities,” “rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation,” schools that teach students nothing, and “the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential.”

In Monday’s inaugural address Trump was more prescriptive and detailed as he ticked off a variety of policy goals that he said he intended to achieve.  “The entire nation is rapidly unifying behind our agenda,” he said on Monday, “with dramatic increases in support from virtually every element of our society, young and old, men and women, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, urban, suburban, rural.”


National Mandate?

“Very importantly,” Trump added, “…we had a powerful win in all seven swing states and the popular vote. We won by millions of people.”  Donald J. Trump (Republican) won 77,284,118 votes, which accounted for 49.8% of the total votes cast, the second-highest vote total in U.S. history, only behind Joe Biden’s (Democratic) 2020 vote result was still higher in the number of votes than Trump received in 2020 vote count, and lost to Biden.

Biden’s 2020 presidential garnered 306 electoral votes and 81,283,098 popular votes, accounting for 51.3% of the votes cast. Trump’s 2024 results neither merit the popular myth Republicans and Trump himself often cite as justification of a so-called sweeping agenda that his election in 2024 enabled and a landslide for him resulting a national mandate for his agenda.

The 2024 United States presidential election results did not reflect a national mandate, in spite of Republicans statements. The election did produce an outcome of Republican control of the Senate, and the narrowest of margin in the House resulting in complete party control of both congressional bodies as the 2025 legislative session begin.

Donald Trump (Republican) won the presidency with in 2024 with:

  • 77,296,195 popular votes (49.8%)

Kamala Harris (Democratic) lost less than 1.5% of the total vote:

  • 75,004,726 popular votes (48.3%)

Energy Markets React to Trump’s Inauguration Speech — a big oil win

“Companies involved in oil and gas exploration, and extraction stand to gain as U.S. environmental safeguards and a national climate policy are dismantled and replaced by increases in national fossil fuel investments and greater taxpayer subsidies supporting dirty energy interests”, Reuters reported.

The White House also declared on Monday that President Trump would withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, the global pact among nations coordinating the fight to slow planetary climate change.  

 By withdrawing from the accord, the United States will join Iran, Libya and Yemen as the only four countries not party to the agreement, under which nations work together to keep global warming below levels that could lead to to environmental catastrophe.  The move, one of several energy-related announcements in the hours immediately following Trump’s inauguration, represents an about-face in United States participation in the global climate agreement and future negotiations.

 During his first term Mr. Trump withdrew from the Paris accord, but then President Biden quickly rejoined in 2020 after winning the White House. Scientists, activists and Democratic officials assailed the move as one that would deepen the climate crisis and backfire on American workers.

 Coupled with Mr. Trump’s other energy measures on Monday, withdrawal from the pact signals his administration’s determination to double down on fossil-fuel extraction and production, and to move away from clean-energy technologies including electric vehicles,  solar power, wind turbines, and other successful clean energy options now addressing global warming and other fossil fuel impacts…

Truth Lies

Trump Returns to Power in a Era of Uncertainty for Hawaii and the World

Tens of millions of Americans have cast their votes in the Presidential race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, one of the closest and most consequential in modern history.

Trump’s sweeping election victory, the world is now preparing for another four years of unpredictability and “America first” protectionism that could reset the ground rules of the global economy, empower autocrats and erase the assurance of American protection for democratic partners.

Kamala Harris won Hawaii’s four Electoral College votes, securing 62% of the vote compared to 35% for Donald Trump, but hopes came crashing down on Tuesday night, when she suffered a resounding election loss to Trump. While many of Harris’s supporters had braced themselves for a tight election that could swing either way, the magnitude of Trump’s rout was jarring.

By Wednesday morning, Trump had swept five of the seven battleground states and appeared on his way to cinching the last two once votes in those places were counted. Trump was also on pace to win the popular vote, the first time a Republican nominee has done so in 20 years.

2024 ElectionOn a happier note, in the Senate, Mazie Hirono, Hawaii’s incumbent Democrat, won re-election with 64% of the vote, defeating Republican Bob McDermott. Hawaii’s other Federal races produced expected Democratic victories, e.g., in the 1st Congressional District, incumbent Democrat Ed Case will return for another term, and in the 2nd Congressional District, Democrat Jill Tokuda secured 63% of votes, ensuring her return for another term.   This outcome was consistent with Hawaii’s historical tendency to support Democratic candidates in presidential elections.

For Harris, her hopes for victory came crashing down on Tuesday night as she suffered a resounding loss to Trump.  Many Harris’s supporters braced themselves for a tight election that could swing either way, but the magnitude of Trump’s victory was jarring. By Wednesday morning, the former president had swept five of the seven battleground states and appeared on his way to cinching the last two once votes in those places were counted. Trump was also on pace to win the popular vote, the first time a Republican nominee has done so in 20 years.

Republicans now control the Senate, and the Executive and Judiciary branches of the Federal government, amid a slew of victories by allies of Trump, and giving Trump’s  GOP powerful leverage over domestic and global policy, tax and spending priorities, and a far-right social agenda.  The last remaining chamber of government still up for grabs is control of the House of Representatives, which will likely not be resolved for several days.

For Democrats, the lessons of this election cycle are sobering.

When Vice President Kamala Harris took the reins of the Democratic Party just over 100 days ago, it was the latest triumph in a political career that has been marked by both reversals of fortune and history-making breakthroughs.  Harris, a multiracial child of immigrants and a career public servant, has always combined left-leaning ideals with pragmatic governing instincts, which generally translated into a middle-of-the-road path forward.

She ran a presidential campaign imbued with reverence for America’s democratic institutions.   But in the end, she came up short against a 78-year-old felon and former reality television star who assailed those same institutions as corrupt. She was the second woman to lead a major party’s presidential ticket — and the second to lose to Trump, a White man who ran a campaign marked by brazen appeals to nativism, racism and misogyny.

The pain of defeat — and of its implications for both Harris, her party, and the Country are still being absorbed by Democrats. The overriding question for the Country now is can we heal as a nation with President Donald Trump – again?

Climate Change Before & After

Hurricane Helene; climate poster child

Helene

— UPDATE (Oct. 18th 2024, originally published Oct 3rd) —

Officials called Hurricane Helene’s deadly rainfall and floods “biblical” and “generational.” But weather forecasters used another term: “once in 1,000 years.”

It is striking Hurricane Helene was actually the second of three back-to-back once-in-a-millennium storm systems striking North Carolina in a matter of days, and shortly thereafter to be followed by Hurricane Milton which made landfall in Florida on October 9, 2024, following Helene, which made landfall in Florida on September 26, 2024.

Hurricane Milton devastated communities that were still recovering from Hurricane Helene. But the precursor of a set of three super storms was an unnamed tropical storm which was labeled once-in-1,000-year storm with rains swamping communities on the opposite side of the state, and inundating homes along the coast.

It’s a mistake to believe we’ll only see one of these storms within a lifetime and in a given place. That’s because of the supercharging effects of climate change on weather, contributing to the likelihood of catastrophic rains increases, said Daniel Swain, a climatologist at the University of California Los Angeles.

After Hurricane Helene’s super heated energy ripped through the US Southeast this past week, the Harris and Trump campaigns saw things very differently as to the cause and effects of this unprecedented and climate-heated storm systems most recently demonstrated in the form of hurricane Helene; the latest example of the new climate-fueled weather reality facing the United States and the world.

Helene has left millions still without power in states including Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee and Virginia.  And days after Helene struck, the outside world still has only a rough idea as to the wholesale storm damage, harrowing escapes and still fully unaccounted loss of lives with homes, businesses and infrastructure fully destroyed.

It was a storm of unparalleled scale, ravaging the south-eastern end of the United States (a total of seven states). So far Helene has killed over 200 people with a death toll continuing to rise. The storm’s cost measured in damage and destruction has been estimated in the billions of dollars impacting public and private properties, and disrupting of commerce.

Helene 1

 

Helene2

Helene3


Politics vs. Climate Reality

It is has been a long road to belief and the need for an overdue public awakening since Al Gore’s book “Earth in the Balance” was first published in 1992.

Since that time, America has struggled between the polar opposites..of strong and compounding scientific climate evidence versus wishful thinking and outright denial. Based on scientific findings of the past 50 years a common climate cause & effect message has evolved and become somewhat finalized. This forward energy moved the needle of public opinion from the obscure to front page news. A meaningful climate response was (is) developing as policy – right now..

Over the past four years the Biden – Harris Administration has led on climate policies in synch with a national awakening that our planet is in trouble, and we’re directly responsible.

Directing US government agencies, President Biden’s one-term presidency took up the fight against global heating denial and previous executive inaction.

In the world today,  fully obscured in media-politics are information outlets often commingling facts (news) with fiction and myth.

Overcoming partisan warfare, President Biden and his VP co-pilot Kamala Harris found a way forward with meaningful climate policies directed at the United States and the world.

The Biden-Harris administration’s climate work was translated into a signature moment for President Biden back August 2022. The president signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This achievement capped nearly two years of administration effort to pass sweeping bipartisan legislation addressing a growing climate crisis mostly ignored up that point by both political parties and previous administrations.

With passage of the IRA plan, the Biden-Harris team unleashed hundreds of billions of dollars directed at US clean energy projects which are advancing national technology development and innovation and creating with it a 21st century American economic renaissance.

Newly enacted regulations supporting the IRA climate legislation goals were also enacted and primarily directed at throttling planet-warming pollution from cars, methane blenching oil wells, and dirty-energy power plants.  Together, represented well over half of all greenhouse gas emissions released by the United States.

Some of the resulting IRA policies were explicitly designed to be popular — winning over hearts and minds as tax breaks turned homeowners into solar enthusiasts and dollars flowed into US factories, and creating new 21st century jobs. However, historically and politically uncharacterized, a sizable portion of IRA funds are directed towards deeply red districts where voters are more likely than not to be skeptical of climate connected changes and disbelievers of bonafide climate science.

“We’ve been able to get an incredible thing done (IRA becoming law), and it’s just the beginning,” said Andrew Reagan, executive director of Clean Energy for America, a group that advocates on behalf of America’s growing ranks of clean energy workers. “All of the hard work over the next 10 years by folks in the government and folks in the private sector is going to be what makes this an essential and successful economic transformation .”


Trump 2.0: no science or common sense, just politics

If elected in 2024, Donald Trump has promised a repeat performance of his first disastrous term in which he will yank the United States out of the Paris Climate Accord for a second time — if he wins the presidency again in November.  Trump’s statement last Friday comes after years of Big Oil and their Republican minions preparing for this election moment going about updating their pro-pollution playbook while laying the groundwork for Trump the candidate to withdraw from the global agreement if elected.

On June 1, 2017, newly elected President Trump announced from the Rose Garden that the United states will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord, fulfilling a then 2016 campaign promise.  Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris global Climate Agreement effectively provided a significant blocking of meaningful actions to lowering and eliminating global greenhouse gas emissions, especially with the United States among the top three climate polluters and agreement signatories. It was no less than a major four year global set-back towards the social-economic clean energy progress already in motion within the United States, and certainly a roadblock to a global transition into clean energy economy … just as Big Oil planned it.

The Paris Accord signatories are a recognition of the serious threat Global Heating represents to everyone on the planet, as well as the unified response and roadmap to progress for the 195 member nations to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in addressing what has become global threat — it was also an agreement which took more than over 10 years to finalize, and was (and is) based on the most credible scientific climate findings and political compromise among a diverse group of member nations creating the agreement.

The Paris Climate Accord also blurs the distinction between developed and developing countries, requiring all nations to submit plans for emission reductions in context to a global problem requiring a global solution.  The United States is typically ranked as the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases globally, about 6 billion tons of CO2 per year, behind only China.


REPAIRING A PLANET IN DISTRESS

In addressing climate impacts as a national, as well as global problem, the Biden-Harris administration set-forth on day one of it’s administration to repair the national and global damage of Trump administration climate policies and actions in targeting previous climate reforms and withdrawing from the Paris Accord, which was followed by four years of chaotic swings in policy and national direction.

The day one priority for the then 2021 newly elected President Biden was for the United States to rejoin the Paris Climate Accord as soon as possible in it role previous leadership role as a full partner to the Accord. Following the restoration of the US leadership and participation in the global climate actions, the Biden-Harris administration focused their attention on transforming and restoring American leadership as a global clean energy leader and technology competitor.

The bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act was the crowning jewel in President Biden national accomplishments on climate, which placed national needs ahead of party politics, including an emphasis on deeply red southern states and districts — where voters are more likely to be skeptical of climate science and the connection to global heating changes now underway, as Hurricane Helene recently demonstrated.

  • Trump 2.0 vows to abandon the Paris Climate Agreement, and plans also plans to pull-out of the 32-year-old UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that underpins the entire structure of international cooperation against warming temperatures. There would be far-reaching and enduring impacts, and potentially sidelining US leadership and interests on climate talks for years to come, as was the case when Trump first took office in 2016.

IRA CLIMATE FUNDING IN JEOPARDY

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is a significant piece of legislation signed into law by President Biden on August 16, 2022, and another climate target by Trump 2.0.

The legislation allocates $369 billion for energy security and climate change programs over ten years.   Key aspects of the IRA include:

  1. Reduce the federal deficit to fight inflation
  2. Invest in domestic (clean) energy production and manufacturing
  3. Lower carbon emissions by approximately 40% by 2030
  4. Reduce healthcare costs (also a driver of inflation)

The IRA provisions include tax incentives for clean energy projects, bonuses for investments in low-income communities and energy communities and extends and expands credits for energy-efficient home improvements and residential clean energy installations (many Hawaii business and residents are benefitting from the IRA).

Healthcare, like energy transformation, is a growing 21st century challenge

The Biden-Harris IRA bill also addresses key issues within Medicare by enabling the system to lower taxpayer and patient costs by allowing the system to negotiate drug prices with manufacturers for the first time – a most helpful action in light of aging population.The IRA also caps out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries at $2,000 annually, and extends Affordable Care Act premium subsidies through 2025.  But the real ground breaking aspects of the IRA legislation are its climate-weighted national economic benefits of an emerging US clean energy sector.

The legislation has already spurred over $500 billion in private sector manufacturing and efficiency investments since its 2022 enactment, including approximately $240 billion in clean energy manufacturing.

The underlying economic and social goals, beyond the health benefits to society from a clean energy economy, is the IRA creating good-paying 21st century jobs in the emerging global green energy economy.

The 2024 Candidate Trump version has promised to redirect IRA away from climate-crisis focused funding, and to scrap IRA funding for clean energy — such a move will put at risk billions of dollars in grants and other support already earmarked — but not yet delivered — to clean energy ventures.

Trump 2.0 has pledged to “claw-back” IRA funding from national Climate programs and incentives already in progress.

Billions of dollars for climate and transitional clean energy funding dollars are at stake if Trump is elected in 2024.  The Biden administration, aware of this risk, have been working to swiftly distribute climate money, putting much of it out of a new president’s reach.  The Biden administration has further tried to pare back oil industry emissions of methane (a most potent greenhouse gas) and key by-product component of natural gas production and consumption through the IRA program.

The Trump camp has already stated they will “remake the EPA” and its environmental regulations and policies which get in their way of their big oil pro-pollution and fossil-fuel growth agenda, further placing air, water, and climate protections at risk.

The outcome of November’s election will go a long way to deciding what happens next — but not all the way.  Investors, analysts and developers whose decisions shape the American energy transition are resolute: A victorious Trump can’t fully halt the country’s green shift.

Putting campaign rhetoric aside, it’s clear that the sweeping 2022 climate law known as the Inflation Reduction Act has been built to withstand political attacks. Some IRA grant money has already gone out the door.  IRA tax credits are now seeding factories in Republican strongholds, but reversals on climate change mitigation efforts and clean energy progress as foreseen in Trump’s vision and agenda – and if elected, Trump will return to a familiar theme of climate denialism as national policy.


Going backwards is not a an option for humanity or the United States. As Gore’s book pointed out, life on Earth is increasingly out-of-balance.

Truth Lies

2024 Presidential Election is all about Character – editorial

CHARACTER …refers to the aggregate of traits and qualities that define an individual’s personality.

It encompasses moral and ethical attributes that distinguish one person from another. Character traits can include aspects like integrity, resilience, and social behavior. This definition emphasizes how character influences interactions and decisions in both personal and social contexts 


WHY CHARACTER MATTERS – Candidate Donald Trump (R)

There was a time in the American presidency when character and integrity counted for something… 

Candidate Donald Trump (R) was convicted earlier this year on 34 Felony counts – sentencing is pending, while recent national polls indicated a near tie position with Vice President Kamala Harris (D).

Candidate Trump also faces an additional three Federal lawsuits now in various stages, regardless of the outcome of the 2024 race for the Presidency.

The pending Federal lawsuits Trump faces include alleged actions then President Trump committed and otherwise engaged in illegal interference with the intent to change the outcome of the 2020 election outcome in which President Joe Biden was elected.

  • Federal Election Interference case: Trump faces four federal felony charges related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election results
  • Georgia Election Interference case: Trump faces 13 state felony charges in Georgia, including racketeering, related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in that state.
  • Federal Classified Documents Theft and Obstruction case: The case was dismissed by a Trump-GOP appointed Florida judge in July 2024. Dept. of Justice prosecutors have appealed the decision and the case is pending further action.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE — BREAKING NEWS – Oct 6, 2024

Donald Trump laid the groundwork to try to overturn the 2020 election even before he lost, knowingly pushed false claims of voter fraud and “resorted to crimes” in his failed bid to cling to power, according to a newly unsealed court filing from prosecutors that offers new evidence from the landmark criminal case against the former president.

Trump Orange ManThe filing from special counsel Jack Smith’s team offers the most comprehensive view to date of what prosecutors intend to prove if the case charging Trump with conspiring to overturn the election reaches trial.

Though a months-long congressional investigation and the indictment itself have chronicled in stark detail Trump’s efforts to undo the election, the filing cites previously unknown accounts offered by Trump’s closest aides to paint a portrait of an “increasingly desperate” president who while losing his grip on the White House “used deceit to target every stage of the electoral process.”

Special Counsel reveals new details of Trump’s illegal action in an attempt to overturn 2020 election

— New evidence in unsealed court filing (October 2nd) argues the former president is not entitled to immunity from prosecution, and therefore subject to the law, just like any other citizen. The filing was submitted by special counsel Jack Smith’s team following a Supreme Court 6-3 opinion that conferred broad immunity on former presidents for official acts they take in office.

Several standouts points of the Special Counsel’s latest case filings include:

  1. New evidence shows Donald Trump “resorted to crimes” in a failed bid to cling to power after losing the 2020 election.
  2. According to federal prosecutors, in a newly unsealed court filing, the former president is not entitled to immunity from prosecution.
  3. The new filing cites previously unknown accounts offered by Trump’s closest aides to paint a portrait of an “increasingly desperate” president who, while losing his grip on the White House, “used deceit to target every stage of the electoral process”.

DONATIONS, BRIBES and Quid Pro Quo

Donald Trump has made a controversial request to oil industry executives for significant campaign contributions.  Trump reportedly asked oil industry executives to donate $1 billion to aid his campaign to retake the White House and in exchange, Trump promised to:

  • Roll back environmental regulations
  • Hasten permitting and leasing approvals
  • Preserve or enhance tax benefits for the oil and gas industry
  • This request was allegedly made during a meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, attended by executives from major oil companies including Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips

The idea of personal character mattering for any candidate of public office is an easy answer; of course.  But for the office of the President of the United States, character not only matters, it is the essential qualification for the office.


Trump Immunity Indiment

Project 2025

Project 2025 – a global heating manifesto

Editorial

 

The Heritage Foundation’s total revenue in 2022 was over $106 million USD ($106,329,524).  As a non-profit, Heritage is not required by law to disclose all of its donors. Needless to say the Heritage foundation is politically powerful, financially powerful, and certainly influential with an audience of ideologically far-right supporters.

The organization’s most recent policy accomplishment is its political roadmap for Donald Trump and other Republican candidates of the 2024 election cycle entitled Project 2025.

Candidate Trump and many GOP party’s candidates for Federal office view Project 2025 as their guide or bible to policy.  What makes Project 2025 significant is the level of GOP attention and support garnered for the 920 page manifesto, with little intellectual engagement and investigation into to the public effects and assumptions contained within the document.

Overall, Project 2025 advocates a significant reduction and elimination of state and federal public and environmental protections. The manifesto effectively calls for the elimination of climate change mitigation policies and regulations.   The plan further targets environmental science and protections of Federal agencies currently charged with enforcement and management by e.g.,

  • Abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  • Reducing and eliminating federally-funded climate research efforts
  • Downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with the goal of creating an operational state of ineffectiveness by eliminating and-or reducing both the agency’s effectiveness and ability to engage in enforcement activities supported by science and research, both essential the agency’s environmental protection mission.

Project 2025 further calls for increased government support of the fossil fuel industrial sector — a common theme throughout the foundation’s 2025 policy manifesto, and today’s Republican party at large.

Project 2025 is also a playbook calling for the wholesale retrenchment from a national climate policy and public protections. It is a retreat from policies supporting a national transformation into a clean energy economy, and the defunding of key government programs design to protect the public interest and health.

Project 2025 further ignores the reality of a global race to a net zero, and as the world advances, the need for the United States to lead by example in the global effort to reduce the harms of climate change.

Last year, the US alone saw a record 28 climate disasters that cost $1 billion or more while this year, searing heat waves and massive wildfires have delivered and offer a peek at an increasingly climate-dangerous future, unless the world adapts to changes already in the pipeline.  The world’s climate is changing and it will continue to change as we continue to emit more greenhouse gas emissions and pollutants.

Project 2025 PollPresident Biden’s signature climate and energy law, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), is fueling the growth of a unprecedented national clean energy transition. One which has been enabling the adoption of zero emissions and renewable wind and solar energy sources, battery storage, and other clean technologies reducing local and global emissions along with consumer energy costs.

The IRA is already lowering consumer costs in both the electric utility and ground transportation sectors of our economy — and that’s just the beginning of the IRA’s public and planetary benefits with a multiplier effect in the decades to come.

The threat Project 2025, if adopted, poses to clean energy is important to the economy of Hawaii, and the United States in whole, and by extension, the future in addressing a world of warming climate impacts.

Project 2025 is little more than a how-to guide to repealing the IRA’s policy pathway to a national clean-energy economy benefiting most, if not all Americans. Its adoption will represent a significant step backwards in saving a planet on which all humankind depends, regardless of political beliefs.

Hammer And Sickle

A Third Russian Revolution?

You say you want a revolution,Well, you know we all wanna change the world..  

First there was the Russian Revolution in 1917 when several groups loosely afflicted with what would later become Russia’s Communist Party overthrew Russia’s last royal family, Nicholas II, czar and absolute ruler of Russia.

Two world wars and one cold war later, the second Russian resolution managed to throw out of power the Communist controlled government, that was back in 1991. With it came the establishment of a short-lived experiment in democracy, coupled to a hybrid form of capitalism led by President Yeltsin. That revolution only lasted a brief 8 years before the transitional government takeover by Vladimir Putin, ex-KGB and hard core communist, who turned his hammer and sickle in for a starring role as Russia’s absolute leader and chief oligarch.

With the invasion of the Ukraine, Russia’s highly leveraged military machine has surprisingly suffered major losses since the start of the war with and in the Ukraine. Increasingly reliant on internal mercenary factions, and most specifically, the Wagner Group, these mercenaries-for-hire are a part of a growing network of Russian-based organizations that serve as military contractors, and the Wagner Group led by chief Yevgeny Prigozhin is key to Putin’s plan for victory in Ukraine.

The reasons for Putin pushing Russia into an unwanted and unwarranted war with the Ukraine I’ll leave to historians, but Wagner Group’s Prigozhin summed the war with Ukraine this way, “What was the war for? The oligarchic clan that rules Russia needed the war.”

The Wagner Group’s cannon fodder style battle strategy has been reasonable successfully against Ukraine’s highly trained, often outnumbered, but committed forces. As long as Wagner has unlimited access to Russia’s military supplies and prisons to restock its highly expendable rank and file, they will remain a major threat to Ukraine’s war plans.

In what has been mounting criticism of the Russia’s military leadership, Wagner’s Prigozhin has been in engaged in a feud with the established military leadership, a feud that  has been simmering for months. Prigozhin, however, has been careful to avoid naming Russia’s president Putin,  carefully avoiding any direct criticism.  He has, however, repeatedly slammed Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Gen. Valery Gerasimov for not supplying his forces with enough ammunition and for failing to conduct the war effectively

Prigozhin’s challenge to the Russian Defense Ministry — and by proxy, to Putin — has thrown Moscow into an unexpected crisis that threatens to undermine Putin’s war effort in Ukraine.

Prigozhin’s conflict with Russia’s military leadership over the course of the long, bitter fight for Bakhmut came to a head this week, with Wagner group forces making an abrupt about-face after heading back into Russia on the road to Moscow and Putin’s doorstep, who at last report had left the Capital for an unknown destination.

Russain RevolutionPutin mobilized Russian troops on Saturday to defend Moscow from what he called an armed rebellion by Mr. Prigozhin, whose forces had claimed control of Rostov-on-Don and were seen moving north along a highway toward the Russian capital. Then, in a surprise turn of events, the Belarusian president, Alexsandr G. Lukashenko, said he had secured Mr. Prigozhin agreement to halt his forces’ advance. Mr. Prigozhin confirmed that he was turning his forces around.

With the outcome the Wagner Group’s aborted march on Moscow earlier today, and the events of the last 24 hours, world leaders are monitoring the situation closely while the stability of world’s second largest nuclear power hangs in the balance.

Before Russia’s war in Ukraine, Americans may recognized Wagner’s Prigozhin as the financier of the Internet Research Agency — the Russian “troll farm” that the Justice Department indicted in 2018 for interfering with the United States’ 2016 presidential election by weaponizing social media in moves designed to support the Trump candidacy.


For ongoing coverage of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine see BeyondKona’s “Headline News” section: https://www.beyondkona.com/national-headline-news/   

Wind Solar

Governor Ige States His Intention to Veto SB 2510


News Update

June 27th, 2022

Governor Ige publicly declared his intentions today regarding SB 2510:

“I think the measure is just misguided,” Ige said. “I was trying to find a reason to support the measure. I could not find a single reason to support SB 2510.”


(first published May 26, 2022)

An Open Letter to Governor Ige

 

The Honorable David Y. Ige,

Governor, State of Hawaii

State Capital

Honolulu, Hawai’i 96813

 

Subject: SB 2510

 

I’m writing this letter on behalf of myself and others within our island community urging you NOT to sign into law SB 2510.

SB2510, sent to you for ratification, represents a fundamental and misguided change to Hawaii’s long standing RPS clean and sustainable energy objectives.

Hawaii’s energy policy and its execution may not be a subject most residents follow closely. However, there is a firsthand public understanding as to the costs of living in Hawaii and the role energy plays in household and business budgets. There is also a growing public awareness of climate and environmental costs coupled with energy combustion options, be they fossil fuels or biomass applications – costs which extend into all aspects of society, including economic, public health, and the rich island environment on which we all depend.

The burning of trees and trash is set for statewide expansion, as envisioned in SB 2510, and carries with it similar climate and health consequences to that of burning fossil fuels. SB 2510 ensures that Hawaii’s air pollution problems will increase. With an anticipated partial off-set in the electrification of the state’s transportation in vehicle emissions, increased power demand through local fuel production and combustion will unnecessarily off-set a lowering of vehicle emissions. This will occur as fossil fuel production emissions presently produced off shore are swapped for locally-generated biomass energy production emissions. A problem easily avoided through zero emissions energy options presently available to Hawaii electric utilities.

Within the last two years Hawaii has faced its share of social and economic challenges, e.g., a global and ongoing pandemic, fossil fuel energy markets in turmoil, and most recently, an embargo on Russian oil imports impacting HECO (among others) energy supply chains and fuel contracts.  Perhaps, recent events account for the Senate’s panicked response to RPS energy reforms (lost opportunities from previous sessions) in this year’s rush to create and pass SB 2510, but such actions have now resulted in significant and unfounded energy policy changes with unintended consequences.

If this legislation does become law, it will not only represent an overall set-back in Hawaii’s transition to a clean energy economy, but with implications for rising public energy costs and greater hospitalizations.

Reasons to Veto SB2510:

The bill’s “firm renewable energy” definition and mandate ignores reliable and on demand 24×7 solar and wind alternative energy alternatives offering superior cost performance, environmental – climate benefits and energy options when scaled to grid demands and in combination with batteries and/or hydro energy storage options.

A Stanford University study released last December produced an extensive scientific finding challenging the very arguments used to justify biomass energy mandates by the authors of SB 2510.

Contrary to SB2510 assumptions used to justify the bill’s passage, the Stanford report focused on grid stability in the presence of 100% clean, renewable (zero air pollution and zero carbon) energy in six isolated states (Alaska, California, Florida, Hawaii, New York, and Texas), and six grid regions within the continental United States and Hawaii.  The over 400 page report concluded:

  • “Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage.”
  • “All states and regions can maintain grid stability (avoid blackouts), despite variable and extreme weather, while providing 100% of their all-purpose energy with Wind, Solar, and storage.”

Along with extensive promotional taxpayer subsidies within a companion bill SB2511, together, these two bills are designed to fast track and otherwise promote biomass combustion-based energy outcomes ahead of all other reasonable options governing Hawaii’s energy future — bad energy policy by any measurement.

SB 2510 is rife with false assumptions and a fundamental lack of legislative understanding and due diligence required to justify a so-called firm-energy policy primarily manifested in unsustainable and polluting biomass energy burn options, while fully ignoring the public health consequences and overall societal costs.

  • Scientific and health organizations correctly defined the public health consequences conventional biomass burn options this way…  “Biomass is far from “clean” – burning biomass creates air pollution that causes a sweeping array of health harms, from asthma attacks to cancer to heart attacks, resulting in emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and premature deaths.” *
*The Allergy & Asthma Network, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, National Association of County & City Health Officials, National Environmental Health Association, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Energy winners and losers

The Public Utilities Commission, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, Hawaii State Energy Office, the Elemental Excelerator, and other agencies have raised serious SB 2510 concerns, citing among things the entire decision premise of emerging technologies, and the winner-loser energy percentage mandates of the bill. They agree that;

  1. Energy policy should be flexible and consider various factors based on shifting information.
  2. SB2510 SD2 HD1 CD1 instead would erroneously dictate in advance a rigid State energy policy.
  3. The bill’s “firm renewable energy” definition ignores very reliable solar and wind alternative energy backed up by batteries, whose technology is improving and whose costs are dropping every year, and ignores innovations in efficiency, programming, and design.

When Hawaii’s energy alternatives are clean (zero emissions) energy sources and combined with reliable storage options, and finally, when scaled to the task to serve as 24×7 on-demand energy available alternatives the goal and definition of “firm energy” is fundamentally different than as defined in SB 2510.

Grid energy projects demonstrating the potential of zero emissions energy options fulfilling the firm energy role are currently operating in Australia and California energy markets. The firm energy assumptions on which SB2510 is based fail the test of completeness and truthful analysis by favoring so-called biomass “firm” energy options, and certainly do not merit regulated energy preferences as set forth in SB 2510.

SB 2510 also contains an arbitrary choice of energy to serve as home grown energy replacements under a new revised RPS statewide energy policy — a policy weighted heavily towards establishing biomass energy deployment ahead of all other localized energy replacement options, i.e.; on-demand solar – wind and storage.

Dictating which energy replacement sources, and how much, is fundamentally contrary the energy marketplace and aforementioned facts of why energy choices matter and must be made based on cost, performance, climate, social, health, and environmental impacts or benefits, and not by politicians and energy lobbyists.

To find examples of grid operations embracing zero emissions generation technologies in sync with 21st centuries clean energy realities, one need look no further than California, Australia, and Europe for zero emissions energy installations designed to scale as 24×7 fossil fuel replacement options, and which clearly defy the founding assumptions supporting SB 2510.

During your two terms as Governor of Hawaii you have demonstrated a unique and professional understanding of Hawaii’s underlying electricity challenges. You’ve also assisted in the state’s transition to a 100% renewable, sustainable, clean energy electricity system viewed favorably by Hawaii’s residents.

Every retiring governor asks themselves the question: how will I be remembered, by my public accomplishments or my mistakes? Setting Hawaii on a course to a clean energy economy is a worthy accomplishment for any governor past or present – fulfill your accomplishments as Governor and veto SB 2510.

Mahalo a nui loa,

Bill Bugbee




The Myth of Biomass

Biomass Ghg Air Pollution 1

 

Burning biomass emits large amounts of pollutants, just like burning other solid fuels such as coal. Burning organic material emits particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) — as is the case with Hu Honua biomass energy facility, Hawaii Island — if allowed to proceed with its operational requests before the state PUC and/or win through litigation and / or political and financial influence, and further supported through a well-funded media campaign now playing out in the  state’s top newspaper (the Star Advertiser) and through HPR radio.  Stay tuned, local TV ads are likely next.

As previously cited, when biomass fuels are burned the stored carbon and other greenhouse gases are released into the atmosphere.  Scientific and health organizations correctly defined the public health consequences conventional biomass options this way…  “Biomass is far from “clean” – burning biomass creates air pollution that causes a sweeping array of health harms, from asthma attacks to cancer to heart attacks, resulting in emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and premature deaths.”

Public Awareness  and Action

There is a growing public awareness among our residents as to impactful changes global warming is having on our local climate, and by extension our island state’s environment, as well as our social and economic future.  If SB 2510 is signed into law it will represent a set-back in Hawaii’s transition to a clean energy economy and sustainable future, with side effect implications measured in rising public health costs and greater hospitalizations.

Taking the uncertain energy path to so-called “firm energy” alternatives and burning our way to satisfy electricity demand is neither sustainable or renewable as in sunshine and Hawaii’s tradewinds. However, the Hawaii envisioned in SB 2510 over the next 20 years, will be loaded with higher than necessary energy, environmental, and climate costs for our island communities. Who pays? The short answer is Hawaii’s residents and an Aloha spirit respectfully to all things living.